Oppositional Discourse in the digital transformation. A contrastive analysis between face-to-face and video-mediated interviews in English


Abstract


This paper explores Oppositional Discourse (OD) with special attention to video-mediated communication in English. I will first qualify the various dimensions of OD as well as its linguistic triggers. Then, I will carry out an exploratory study to test if and to what extent the digital transformation has contributed to possible changes in OD strategies; to do so, a subset of the InterDiplo Covid-19 Corpus, developed at the University of Verona, Italy, will be analyzed. The Corpus covers face-to-face and video-mediated interviews carried out in English between journalists and diplomats/politicians/science experts from different lingua-cultural backgrounds, and is specifically tagged to concentrate on the question-answer interface between interviewer and interviewee. The subcorpus taken into consideration for the present study covers two equal sets of face-to-face and video-mediated interviews to compare non-linguistic and linguistic aspects. The data yielded by this pilot analysis point to differences in the actualization of OD between the two subsets, thus suggesting that the video-mediated environment does play a role in the way interviews unfold.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v58p23

Keywords: broadcast interviews; journalism; language of diplomats; Oppositional Discourse; video-mediated communication

References


Aijmer K. 2013, Understanding Pragmatic Markers. A Variational Pragmatic Approach, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Anderson L. and Lepore E. 2013, Slurring words, in “Noûs” 47 [1], pp. 25-48.

Berghel H. and Berleant D. 2018, The online trolling ecosystem, in “Computer” 51 [8], pp. 44-51.

Bull P. and Simon-Vandenbergen A.-M. 2019, Conflict in Political Discourse, Routledge, London.

Carnevale P.J. and Pruitt D.G. 1992, Negotiation and mediation, in “Annual Review of Psychology” 43, pp. 531-582.

Cavalieri S., Corrizzato S. and Facchinetti R. 2022, The research-practice interface in ESP and the challenges for linguists in the digital era: The case of the InterDiplo Corpus, in Incelli E., Mocini R. and Turnbull J. (eds.), The Research-Practice Interface in English for Specific Purposes: Past, Present and Future, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 190-205.

Chiluwa I. (ed.) 2021a, Discourse and Conflict: Analysing Text and Talk of Conflict, Hate and Peace-building, Palgrave Macmillan, Oxford.

Chiluwa I. 2021b, Introduction: Discourse, conflict and conflict resolution, in Chiluwa I. (ed.), Discourse and Conflict: Analysing Text and Talk of Conflict, Hate and Peace-building, Palgrave Macmillan, Oxford, pp. 1-15.

Clayman S. and Heritage J. 2002, The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Cohen R. 2001, Language and conflict resolution: The limits of English, in “International Studies Review” 3 [1], pp. 25-55.

Culpeper J. Haugh M. and Kádár D. 2017 (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

D’Errico F., Poggi I., Vinciarelli A. and Vincze L. 2015 (eds.), Conflict and Multimodal Communication: Social Research and Machine Intelligence, Springer, New York.

Dedaic M.N. and Nelson D.N. 2003 (eds.), At War with Words, Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin.

Evans M., Jeffries L. and O’Driscoll J. 2019 (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, Routledge, London.

Fanton M., Bonaldi H., Tekiroğlu S.S. and Guerini M. 2021. Human-in-the-loop for data collection: A multi-target counter narrative dataset to fight online hate speech, in Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, long papers, vol. 1, pp. 3226-3240. https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.250 (17.8.2022).

Footitt H. and Kelly M. 2012 (eds.), Languages at War: Policies and Practices of Language Contacts in Conflict, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Goodman S. Sirriyeh A. and McMahon S. 2017, The evolving (Re)categorisations of Refugees throughout the “Refugee/migrant Crisis”, in “Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology” 27 [2], pp. 105-114.

Graham S.L. 2019, Interaction and conflict in digital communication, in Matthews E., Jeffries L. and Jim O’Driscoll J. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, Routledge, London, pp. 310-329.

Grimshaw A.D. 1990 (ed.), Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Hafner C.A. 2021, Discourse and computer-mediated communication, in Hyland K., Paltridge B. and Wong L. (eds.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Bloomsbury, London, pp. 281-293.

Hardaker C. 2017, Flaming and trolling, in Hoffmann C. and Bublitz W. (eds.), Pragmatics of Social Media, Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 493-522.

Haugh M. and Chang W.-L.M. 2019, Indexical and sequential properties of criticism in initial interactions. Implications for examining (im)politeness across cultures, in “Russian Journal of Linguistics” 23, pp. 904-929.

Ho J. 2021, Metaphors, powerlessness and online aggression. How Wuhan lockdown escapees were dehumanised during the COVID-19 pandemic, in “Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict” 11 [1], pp. 77-100.

Hsu J. and Tsai R. 2022, Increased online aggression during COVID-19 lockdowns: Two-stage study of deep text mining and difference-in-differences analysis, in “Journal of Medical Internet Resources” 24 [8], e38776.

Huspek M. 2006. Oppositional discourse: Introductory statement on its ideal and concrete forms, in “Atlantic Journal of Communication” 14 [1-2], pp. 1-6.

IPI 2013: International Press Institute Report 2013. Documenting Change: Reflections on the Arab Spring. https://ipi.media/ipi-report-2013/ (17.8.2022).

Jeffries L. 2014, Opposition in Discourse: The Construction of Oppositional Meaning, Bloomsbury, London.

JLAC 2013 -: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. https://benjamins.com/catalog/jlac (17.8.2022).

Keen E. and Georgescu M. 2016, Bookmarks: A Manual for Combating Hate Speech Online through Human Rights Education, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.

Kelly M., Footitt H. and Salama-Carr M. (eds.) 2019, The Palgrave Handbook of Languages and Conflict, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Lewicki R.J. 1975, A course in bargaining and negotiation, in “The Teaching of Organizational Behavior” 1 [1], pp. 29-31.

Lewicki R., Weiss S.E. and Lewin D. 1992, Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis, in “Journal of Organizational Behavior” 13 [3], pp. 209-252.

Pascual-Ferra ́ P., Alperstein N., Barnett D.J. and Rimal R.N. 2021. Toxicity and verbal aggression on social media: Polarized discourse on wearing face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic, in “Big Data & Society” January-June, pp. 1-17.

Patterson K.J. 2022. Dualisms in Jihad. The role of metaphor in creating ideological dichotomies, in “Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict” 11 [1], pp. 121-143.

Pearce W.B. and Littlejohn S.W. 1997, Moral Conflict: When Social Worlds Collide, Sage, Thousand Oaks (CA).

Piirainen-Marsh A. 2005 Managing adversarial questions in broadcast interviews, in “Journal of Politeness Research” 1 [2], pp. 193-217.

Polak S. and Trottier D. (eds.) 2020, Violence and Trolling on Social Media, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.

PSLW 2012 -: Palgrave Studies in Languages at War, Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://link.springer.com/series/14615 (17.8.2022).

Raiffa H. 1985, The Art and Science of Negotiation, Harvard University Press, Harvard.

Rancer A.S. and Avtgis T.A. (eds.) 2014, Argumentative and Aggressive Communication: Theory, Research, and Application, 2 ed., Peter Lang, Bern.

Salager-Meyer F. 2000. Rhetorical evolution of oppositional discourse in French Academic Writing, in “Hermes, Journal of Linguistics” 25, pp. 23-48.

Sanguinetti M., Poletto F., Bosco C., Patti V. and Stranisci M. 2018, An Italian Twitter corpus of hate speech against immigrants, in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Miyazaki, pp. 2798-2805. https://aclanthology.org/L18-1443/ (17.8.2022).

Smith D. 1997, Language and discourse in conflict and conflict resolution, in “Current Issues in Language and Society” 4 [3], pp. 190-214.

UN 2019: UN Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/advising-and-mobilizing/Action_plan_on_hate_speech_EN.pdf (17.8.2022).

Wright S., Chilton P. and Smith D. 1998, Language and Conflict: A Neglected Relationship, Multilingual Matters, Bristol.

Ye B., Zeng Y., Im H., Liu M., Wang X. and Yang Q. 2021, The relationship between fear of COVID-19 and online aggressive behavior: A moderated mediation model, in “Frontiers in Psychology” 12, pp. 1-11.

Zartman W.I. (ed.) 1995, Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars, Washington DC, Brookings Institution.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.