The Autonomy of Urban Commons' Reproduction in Relation to the Local State: Between Material and Decision-Making Autonomy.


Abstract


In the post-Marxist debate, commons have emerged as a means to develop an autonomous path of emancipation from capitalism. However, the extent to which commons can construct this emancipation autonomously from the state is unclear. By focusing its analysis on the city-wide scale, this article examines the extent to which urban commons are materially supported by the local state, the criteria used by the local state in offering its support, and how urban commons perceive it and its claims. The research study is set in Barcelona and presents the results of 101 responses to a survey carried out with 429 urban commons. It shows that many urban commons are able to reproduce thanks to the economic and property support of the local state, that the local state often allocates resources by exercising its discretionary power, and that many urban commons tend not to recognise this support. It concludes by putting forward two main arguments: i) a distinction should be made between material and decision-making autonomy; ii) although urban commons should pursue their material and decision-making autonomy from the state, the material support they receive from the local state can become a temporary survival strategy for them.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v15i2p370

Keywords: collective action; local government; property; self-sufficiency; survey

References


De Angelis, M. (2017) Omnia Sunt Communia. London: Zed Books.

Asara, V. (2019) ‘The Redefinition and Co-Production of Public Services by Urban Movements. The Can Batlló Social Innovation in Barcelona’, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 12(2), pp. 539–565. doi: 10.1285/I20356609V12I2P539.

Ayuntamiento de Barcelona (2016) Memoria 2016. Contratación Pública. Barcelona.

Ayuntamiento de Barcelona (2018) L’economia de Barcelona. Barcelona.

Ayuntamiento de Barcelona (no date) Resumen de subvenciones otorgadas en el Ayuntamiento 2016. Available at: http://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/transparencia/es/resumen-de-subvenciones-otorgadas-al-ayuntamiento-2016 (Accessed: 12 September 2018).

Barcelona En Comú (2015) Programa Electoral Municipales 2015. Barcelona.

Bianchi, I. (2018a) ‘A Relational Approach for the Study of Urban Commons: The Case of the Escocesa Art Centre in Barcelona’, Tracce Urbane. Italian Journal of Urban Studies, 4, pp. 171–193. doi: 10.13133/2532-6562_2.4.14356.

Bianchi, I. (2018b) In, against, beyond and through the State. Limits and possibilities of Urban Commons in Barcelona. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Università IUAV di Venezia.

Bianchi, I. (2018c) ‘The post-political meaning of the concept of commons: the regulation of the urban commons in Bologna’, Space and Polity, 22(3), pp. 287–306. doi:

1080/13562576.2018.1505492.

Blanco, I. (2009) ‘Does a “Barcelona Model” really exist? Periods, territories and actors in the process of urban transformation’, Local Government Studies, 35(3), pp. 355–369. doi: 10.1080/03003930902854289.

Blanco, I., Salazar, Y. and Bianchi, I. (2019) ‘Urban governance and political change under a radical left government: The case of Barcelona’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 42 (1), pp. 18–38. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2018.1559648.

Böhm, S., Dinerstein, A. C. and Spicer, A. (2010) ‘(Im)possibilities of autonomy: Social movements in and beyond capital, the state and development’, Social Movement Studies, 9(1), pp. 17-32. doi: 10.1080/14742830903442485.

Bresnihan, P. and Byrne, M. (2015) ‘Escape into the city: Everyday practices of commoning and the production of urban space in Dublin’, Antipode, 47(1), pp. 36–54. doi: 10.1111/anti.12105.

Cabré, E. and Andrés, A. (2018) ‘La Borda: a case study on the implementation of cooperative housing in Catalonia’, International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(3), pp. 412–432. doi: 10.1080/19491247.2017.1331591.

Caciagli, C. and Milan, C. (2021) ‘Contemporary Urban Commons. Rebuilding the Analytical Framework’, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 14(1), pp. 396–410. doi: 10.1285/I20356609V14I1P396.

Chatterton, P. (2010) ‘Autonomy: The Struggle for Survival, Self-Management and the Common’, Antipode, 42(4), pp. 897–908. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00780.x.

Chatterton, P. (2016) ‘Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(4), pp. 403–415. doi: 10.1111/tran.12139.

Cruz, H., Martínez Moreno, R. and Blanco, I. (2017) ‘Crisis, urban segregation and social innovation in Catalonia’, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(1), pp. 221–245. doi: 10.1285/i20356609v10i1p221.

Cumbers, A. (2015) ‘Constructing a global commons in, against and beyond the state’, Space and Polity, 19(1), pp. 62–75. doi: 10.1080/13562576.2014.995465.

Dadusc, D. (2019) ‘Enclosing autonomy: The politics of tolerance and criminalisation of the Amsterdam squatting movement’, City. Routledge, 23(2), pp. 170–188. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2019.1615760.

Dardot, P. and Laval, C. (2015) Común. Ensayo sobre la revolución del siglo XXI. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Davies, J. S. and Blanco, I. (2017) ‘Austerity urbanism: Patterns of neo-liberalisation and resistance in six cities of Spain and the UK’, Environment and Planning A, 49(7), pp. 1517–1536. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17701729.

Eizenberg, E. (2012) ‘Actually Existing Commons: Three Moments of Space of Community Gardens in New York City’, Antipode, 44(3), pp. 764–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00892.x.

Federici, S. (2011) ‘Feminism And the Politics of the Commons’, in Hughes, C., Peace, S., and Van Meter, K. (eds) Uses of a WorldWind, Movement, Movement s, and Contemporary Radical Currents in the United States. Oaskland: Ak Press, pp. 283–294.

Federici, S. (2018) Re-enchanting the World Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. Oakland: PM Press.

Federici, S. and Caffentzis, G. (2013) ‘Commons Against and Beyond Capitalism’, Upping the Anti: a journal of theory and action, 15, pp. 83–97.

Di Feliciantonio, C. (2017) ‘Spaces of the Expelled as Spaces of the Urban Commons? Analysing the Re-emergence of Squatting Initiatives in Rome’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(5), pp. 708–725. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12513.

Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2009) Commonwealth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Harvey, D. (2012) Rebel Cities. London: Verso.

Hess, C. and Ostrom, E. (2007) Understanding knowledge as a commons: from theory to practice. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Holloway, J. (2010) Crack capitalism. London: Pluto Press.

Huron, A. (2018) Carving out the commons : tenant organizing and housing cooperatives in Washington, D.C. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Lang, R. and Stoeger, H. (2018) ‘The role of the local institutional context in understanding collaborative housing models: empirical evidence from Austria’, International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), pp. 35–54. doi: 10.1080/19491247.2016.1265265.

Leeuw, E. (2008) ‘Choosing the method of data collection’, in de Leeuw, E., Hox, J., and Dillman, D. (eds) International Handbook on Survey Methodology. Hove: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 113–136.

Linebaugh, P. (2008) The Magna Carta Manifesto. Liberties and Commons for all. Berkley: University of California Press.

Lohr, S. (2008) ‘Coverage and sampling’, in de Leeuw, E., Hox, J., and Dillman, D. (eds) International Handbook on Survey Methodology. Hove: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 97–113.

Martí-Costa, M. and Pradel i Miquel, M. (2012) ‘The knowledge city against urban creativity? artists’ workshops and urban regeneration in Barcelona’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(1), pp.92-108. doi: 10.1177/0969776411422481.

Martínez López, M. (2014) ‘How do squatters deal with the state? Legalization and anomalous institutionalization in Madrid’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2), pp. 646-674

doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12086.

Martínez, M. A. (2020) ‘Urban Commons from an Anti-Capitalist Approach’, Partecipazione e Conflitto, 13(3), pp. 1390–1410. doi: 10.1285/I20356609V13I3P1390.

Mattei, U. (2011) Beni comuni. Un manifesto. Bari: Laterza.

Mayer, M. (2013) ‘First world urban activism: Beyond austerity urbanism and creative city politics’, City, 17(1), pp. 5–19. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2013.757417.

Mayer, M., Thörn, C. and Thörn, H. (2016) ‘Re-Thinking Urban Social Movements, “Riots” and Uprisings: An Introduction’, in Mayer, M., Thörn, C., and Thörn, H. (eds) Urban Uprising. London: Pelgrave, pp. 3–57.

Méndez de Andés, A., Hamou, D. and Aparicio, M. (2021) Códigos comunes urbanos. Herramientas para el devenir-común de las ciudades. Barcelona: Icaria.

Micciarelli, G. (2017) ‘Introduzione all’uso civico e collettivo urbano. La gestione diretta dei beni comuni urbani’, Munus, 1, pp. 135–163.

Ministerio de la Presidencia, R. con las C. y igualdad (2017) ‘Ley 9/2017 de Contratos del Sector Público’. España.

De Moor, T. (2103) Homo cooperans. Institution for collective action and the compassionate society. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.

Nel·lo, O. (2015) La ciudad en movimiento: crisis social y respuesta ciudadana. Madrid: Díaz & Pons.

Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Peck, J. (2012) ‘Austerity urbanism: American cities under extreme economy’, City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 16(6), pp. 626–655.

Quarta, A. and Spanò, M. (2016) Beni comuni 2.0. Contro-egemonia e nuove istituzioni. Milano: Mimesis.

Revel, J. (2017) ‘Cinque declinazioni del Comune’. Intervento di apertura della decade di Cerisy, “Le alternative del comune”.

Rossi, U. and Enright, T. (2017) ‘Ambivalence of the Urban Commons’, in Jonas, A. et al. (eds) Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics. New York: Routledge, pp. 77–88.

Russell, B. (2019) ‘Beyond the Local Trap: New Municipalism and the Rise of the Fearless Cities’, Antipode, 51(3), pp. 989–1010. doi: 10.1111/anti.12520.

Sánchez Belando, M. V. (2017) ‘Building alternatives to the creative turn in Barcelona: The case of the socio-cultural centre Can Batlló’, City, Culture and Society, 8, pp. 35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2016.11.001.

Satta, C. and Scandurra, G. (2014) ‘Creatività e spazio urbano’, Territorio, 68, pp. 39–45. doi: 10.3280/tr2014-068006.

Schmelzkopf, K. (1995) ‘Urban Community Gardens as Contested Space’, Geographical Review, 85(3), pp. 364–381. doi: 10.2307/215279.

Stavrides, S. (2016) Common space : the city as commons. London: Zed Books.

Subirats, J. (2016) El poder de lo próximo. Las virtudes del municipalismo. Madrid. Catarata.

Taylor, M. (2002) Public Policy in the Community: : Public Policy and Politics Marilyn Taylor Red Globe Press. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Thompson, M. (2020) ‘What’s so new about New Municipalism?’, Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), pp. 317-342. doi: 10.1177/0309132520909480.

Tornaghi, C. (2017) ‘Urban Agriculture in the Food-Disabling City: (Re)defining Urban Food Justice, Reimagining a Politics of Empowerment’, Antipode, 49(3), pp. 781–801. doi: 10.1111/anti.12291.

Uitermark, J. and Nicholls, W. (2014) ‘From Politicization to Policing: The Rise and Decline of New Social Movements in Amsterdam and Paris’, Antipode, 46(4), pp. 970–991. doi: 10.1111/anti.12025.

Varvarousis, A., Asara, V. and Akbulut, B. (2020) ‘Commons: a social outcome of the movement of the squares’, Social Movement Studies, 20(3), pp. 292-311. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2020.1793753.

Vidal, L. (2019) ‘Cooperative Islands in Capitalist Waters: Limited-equity Housing Cooperatives, Urban Renewal and Gentrification’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(1), pp. 157–178. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12726.

Virno, P. (1983) ‘Do you remember revolution?’, Il Manifesto, 20 February.

Yin, R. K. (2014) Case study research : design and methods. London: Sage Publications.

Yun, G. W. and Trumbo, C. W. (2006) ‘Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web Form’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1), pp. 0–0. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00112.x.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.