Knowledge Action Repertoires and the Outcomes of Collective Action: Local Community Action for Environmental Protection


Abstract


The article uses the knowledge practice repertoire approach, combined with an integrated opportunity approach, to investigate the role that local community knowledge based on holistic worldviews plays in the formation of collective actors, action and outcomes. This is argued to be crucial given that environmental governance is shaped instead by knowledge based on a worldview of a nature/culture divide, and that local community knowledge is key to responding to the planetary crisis and subject to this potential ontological clash. Attention to local community collective action using this lens can shed light on whether and how spaces can be made for different approaches, giving a fresh view to how outcomes matter. The article presents two case studies of local community collective action through community protocols from South Africa and Argentina. Community protocols are documents, recognised in international environmental law, where local communities set out their worldviews, their traditional knowledge and practices in support of environmental protection, and link these to rights and protections in national and international law as a basis for collective action. They are thus ideal sites for investigating knowledge practices and ontological politics. Focusing on different types of knowledge practices and opportunity contexts helped to untangle the complex question of how outcomes mattered to the local communities in these cases.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v14i3p1201

Keywords: Repertoires of knowledge practices; collective action; environmental activism; local communities; community protocols

References


Adger, W. Neil, Tor A. Benjaminsen, Katrina Brown, and Hanne Svarstad. 2001. “Advancing a Political Ecology of Global Environmental Discourses.” Development and Change 32(4):681–715.

Amenta, Edwin, Neal Caren, Elizabeth Chiarello, and Yang Su. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 287–307.

Anaya, James. 2012. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Progress Report on Extractive Industries. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session24/Documents/A-HRC-24-41_en.pdf

Bäckstrand, Karin, and Eva Lövbrand. 2006. “Planting Trees to Mitigate Climate Change: Contested Discourses of Ecological Modernization, Green Governmentality and Civic Environmentalism.” Global Environmental Politics 6(1):50–75.

Bavikatte, Kabir. 2014. Stewarding The Earth. Rethinking Property and the Emergence of Biocultural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bavikatte, Kabir, Daniel F. Robinson, and Maria Julia Oliva. 2015. “Biocultural Community Protocols: Dialogues on the Space Within.” IK: Other Ways Knowing 1(2):1–31.

Bosi, Lorenzo, Marco Giugni, and Katrin Uba, eds. 2016. The Consequences of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chesta, Riccardo. 2020. The Contentious Politics of Expertise: Experts, Activism and Grassroots Environmentalism. Abingdon: Routledge.

Choudry, Aziz, and Dip Kapoor. 2013. NGOization: Complicity, Contradictions and Prospects. London: Zed Books.

Cocchiaro, Gino, Johan Lorenzen, Bernard Maister, and Britta Rutner. 2014. “Consideration of a Legal Trust Model for the Kukula Healers’ TK Commons in South Africa.” Pp. 151–70 in Innovation and Intellectual Property: Collaborative Dynamics in Africa, edited by J. de Beer, C. Armstrong, C. Oguamanam, and T. Schonwetter. Cape Town: UCT Press.

Comunidades indígenas de las Salinas Grandes y Laguna de Guayatayoc de Jujuy y Salta. 2015. Kachi Yupi/Huellas de La Sal: Procedimiento de Consulta y Consentimiento Previo, Libre e Informado Para Las Comunidadades Indígenas de La Cuenca de Salinas Grandes y Laguna de Guayatayoc. Available at: https://naturaljustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Kachi-Yupi-Huellas.pdf

Convention on Biological Diversity. 2010. The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf

Delgado, Natalia Aguilar. 2016. “Community Protocols as Tools for Resisting Exclusion in Global Environmental Governance.” Revista de Administração de Empresas 56(4):395–410.

Dryzek, John S. 2005. The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunford, Robin. 2016. The Politics of Transnational Peasant Struggle. Resistance, Rights and Democracy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Escobar, Arturo. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.

Escobar, Arturo. 1998. “Whose Knowledge, Whose Nature? Biodiversity, Conservation and the Political Ecology of Social Movements.” Journal of Political Ecology 5(53–82).

Eyerman, Ron, and Andrew Jamison. 1991. Social Movements. A Cognitive Approach. University Park, PA.: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Ferradás Abalo, Eliana, Ana Laura Lobo, and María Julieta Lucero. 2016. Conflicto Socioambiental En Salinas Grandes: Neoextractivismo, Resistencias y Nociones de Desarrollo En El Nuevo Escenario Político Regional. Villa María: Universidad Nacional de Villa María.

Findlay, Sarah, and Wayne Twine. 2018. “Chiefs in a Democracy: A Case Study of the ‘New’ Systems of Regulating Firewood Harvesting in Post-Apartheid South Africa.” Land 7(1):35. doi: 10.3390/land7010035.

Forest Peoples Programme, International Indigenous Forum on Biodiversity, Indigenous Women’s Biodiversity Network, Centres of Distinction on Indigenous and Local Knowledge and Secretariat of the

Convention on Biological Diversity. 2020. Local Biodiversity Outlooks 2: The Contributions of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities to the Implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and to Renewing Nature and Cultures. A Complement to the Fifth Edition of Global Biodiversity Outlook. Moreton-in-Marsh, England: Forest Peoples Programme. Available at: www.localbiodiversityoutlooks.net

Giorgi, Alberta. 2018. Religioni Di Minoranza Tra Europa e Laicità Locale. Milano: Mimesis Edizioni.

Giugni, Marco. 2007. “Useless Protest? A Time-Series Analysis of the Policy Outcomes of Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in the United States, 1977-1995.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 12(1):53–77. doi: 10.17813/maiq.12.1.b05j1087v7pxg382.

Hadden, Jennifer. 2015. Networks in Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hauck, Maria, Philile Mbatha, and Rachel Wynberg. 2014. “Coastal Communities and Livelihoods in South Africa and Mozambique.” Pp. 17–36 in Sharing Benefits from the Coast: Rights, Resources and Livelihoods, edited by R. Wynberg and M. Hauck. Cape Town: UCT Press.

Jasanoff, Sheila, and Marybeth Long Martello, eds. 2004. Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Jonas, Harry, Kabir Bavikatte, and Holly Shrumm. 2010. “Community Protocols and Access and Benefit Sharing.” Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 12(3):49–77.

Jukic, Emma, and Neva Collings. 2013. Community Protocols for Environmental Sustainability: A Guide for Policymakers. UNEP, Nairobi and EDO NSW, Sydney.

Kenis, Anneleen. 2019. “Post-Politics Contested: Why Multiple Voices on Climate Change Do Not Equal Politicisation.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37(5). doi: 10.1177/0263774X18807209.

Kolb, Felix. 2007. Protest and Opportunities: The Political Outcomes of Social Movements. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.

Koopmans, Ruud, and Paul Statham. 1999. “Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 4(2):203–21. doi: 10.17813/maiq.4.2.d7593370607l6756.

Marchegiani, Pia, Elisa Morgera, and Louisa Parks. 2020. “Indigenous Peoples’ Rights to Natural Resources in Argentina: The Challenges of Impact Assessment, Consent and Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing in Cases of Lithium Mining.” The International Journal of Human Rights 24(2–3):224–40. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2019.1677617.

Marion Suiseeya, Kimberly R. 2014. “Negotiating the Nagoya Protocol: Indigenous Demands for Justice.” Global Environmental Politics 14(3):102–24.

McAdam, Doug, and Hilary Boudet. 2012. Putting Social Movements in Their Place. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Méndez Cota, Gabriella. 2016. Disrupting Maize. Food, Biotechnology and Nationalism in Contemporary Mexico. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Meyer, David S. 2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30:124–45.

Morgera, Elisa. 2019. “Under the Radar: The Role of Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing in Protecting and Realizing Human Rights Connected to Natural Resources.” The International Journal of Human Rights. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2019.1592161.

Murphree, Marshall. 2004. “Communal Approaches to Natural Resource Management in Africa: From Whence to Where?” Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 7:203–16.

Natarajan, Usha, and Kishan Khoday. 2014. “Locating Nature: Making and Unmaking International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 27(3):573–93. doi: 10.1017/S0922156514000211.

Nelson, Fred. 2010. “Democratizing Natural Resource Governance: Searching for Institutional Change.” Pp. 310–33 in Community Rights, Conservation and Contested Land: The politics of natural resource governance in Africa, edited by F. Nelson. London: Earthscan.

Parks, Louisa. 2018. “Challenging Power from the Bottom up? Community Protocols, Benefit-Sharing, and the Challenge of Dominant Discourses.” Geoforum 88 (February 2017):87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.011.

Parks, Louisa. 2020. Benefit-Sharing in Environmental Governance Local Experiences of a Global Concept. Abingdon: Routledge.

Parks, Louisa, and Elisa Morgera. 2019. “Research Note: Reflections on Methods from an Interdisciplinary Research Project in Global Environmental Law.” Transnational Environmental Law. doi: 10.1017/S204710251900027X.

della Porta, Donatella, Massimiliano Andretta, Lorenzo Mosca, and Herbert Reiter. 2006. Globalization from Below. Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

della Porta, Donatella, and Elena Pavan. 2017. “Repertoires of Knowledge Practices: Social Movements in Times of Crisis.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 12(4):297–314. doi: 10.1108/QROM-01-2017-1483.

Rakotondrabe, Manohisoa, and Fabien Girard. 2021. “Protecting Traditional Knowledge through Biocultural Community Protocols in Madagascar: Do Not Forget the ‘B’ in BCP.” Sustainability 13(18). doi: 10.3390/su131810255.

Ribot, Jesse C., and Nancy L. Peluso. 2003. “A Theory of Access.” Rural Sociology 68(2):153–81.

Robbins, Paul. 2012. Political Ecology. Second Edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Savaresi, Annalisa. 2018. “Traditional Knowledge and Climate Change: A New Legal Frontier?” Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 9(1):32–50.

Schabus, Nicole. 2017. “Traditional Knowledge.” Pp. 264–79 in Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law, edited by E. Morgera and J. Razzaque. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Sibuye, Rodney, Marie-Tinka Uys, Gino Cocchiaro, and Johan Lorenzen. 2012. “The Bushbuckridge BCP: Traditional Healers Organise for ABS in South Africa in Participatory Learning and Action, Biodiversity and Culture: Exploring Community Protocols, Rights and Consent.” Participatory Learning and Action 65 101–8. Retrieved July 9, 2019 (http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G03403.pdf).

de Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Abingdon: Routledge.

Stevenson, Hayley. 2018. Global Environmental Politics. Problems, Policy and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stevenson, Hayley, and John S. Dryzek. 2014. Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Svarstad, Hanne, and Tor A. Benjaminsen. 2020. “Reading Radical Environmental Justice through a Political Ecology Lens.” Geoforum. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.007.

Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tobin, Brendan. 2013. “Bridging the Nagoya Compliance Gap: The Fundamental Role of Customary Law in Protection of Indigenous Peoples’ Resource and Knowledge Rights.” Law, Environment and Development Journal 9(13):142–62.

Traditional Health Practitioners of Bushbuckridge. 2010. Biocultural Protocol of The Traditional Health Practitioners of Bushbuckridge. Available at: http://community-protocols.org/wp-content/uploads/documents/South_Africa-Bushbuckridge_Biocultural_Protocol.pdf

Traditional Health Practitioners of Bushbuckridge. 2017. Biocultural Protocol of The Traditional Health Practitioners of Bushbuckridge, Second Edition. Available at:

https://za.boell.org/sites/default/files/bcp-kukula-traditional-health-practitioners-association-english.pdf

Uba, Katrin. 2016. “Deliberative Protests? Persuading Politicians Not to Close Schools in Swedish Municipalities.” Revista Internacional de Sociología 74(4). doi: 10.3989/ris.2016.74.4.046.

Uggla, Ylva. 2010. “) What Is This Thing Called ‘Natural’? The Nature-Culture Divide in Climate Change and Biodiversity Policy.” Journal of Political Ecology 17(1):79–91.

Ulloa, Astrid. 2019. “Indigenous Knowledge Regarding Climate in Colombia: Aliiculations and Complementarities among Different Knowledges.” Pp. 68–92 in Climate and Culture: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on a Warming World, edited by G. Feola, H. Geoghegan, and A. Arnall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vanhala, Lisa. 2018. “Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 51(3):380–412. doi: 10.1177/0010414017710257.

Vermeylen, Saskia. 2017. “Materiality and the Ontological Turn in the Anthropocene: Establishing a Dialogue between Law, Anthropology and Eco-Philosophy.” in Law and Governance for the Anthropocene, edited by L. Kotzé. Oxford: Hart Publishing.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.