The Pandemic Crisis, Italian Municipalities, and Community Resilience


Abstract


The pandemic caused by Covid-19 has tested the resilience of public institutions, already burdened by a deep and complex crisis (political, economic, managerial). This crisis has revealed a discrepancy between the needs expressed by the community and the solutions adopted to satisfy them. This has been accompanied by a progressive worsening of decision-making efficiency and weak implementation capacity in a context of increasing environmental uncertainty. It is in local institutions, in particular, that the greatest problems are revealed, because of many endemic negative factors: political fragmentation, reduced economic resources, new forms of poverty. Against the background of this scenario, our study aims to analyze the reaction of local institutions to the pandemic crisis by looking at both welfare and communication services. The objective is to identify key features in understanding the resilience of municipalities. In other words, their ability to react and adapt to change, which is essential not only to deal with emergencies, such as the pandemic, but also to make the institution itself sustainable. Our interest is focused on a specific dimension of the resilience of the municipalities, related to collaboration with the third sector. The pandemic has shown that the continuous activism of non-profit organizations has allowed for the continuation of many so-called "ordinary" services, as well as the launch of several initiatives aimed at alleviating other social problems. The research has, first of all, an exploratory character that befits a new and still ongoing phenomenon. The basic questions concern the production of local welfare policies by municipalities. The data show different levels of "interventism" and different modes of communication. On this latter point, we observe the presence of significant attention-seeking among Mayors as community builders able, on the one hand, to reinforce the spirit of solidarity and, on the other, to uphold respect for the rules. On the services side, three main models of response to the pandemic emerge, two of which refer to the public-private relationship in local welfare policies. Findings suggest that these different reactions will have consequences in the immediate future for the management of the pandemic crisis (still ongoing). Specifically, the tendency is to employ a management of services based on partnership-model, which means that public-private collaboration is a pillar of local welfare. This seems to entail a greater legitimacy for individuals or associations to participate in the formulation and implementation of policies.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v14i1p283

Keywords: COVID; crisis communication; governance; resilience; social participation; sustainability; third sector

References


Aldrich D. P. (2012), Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Arena G. (2016), “Democrazia partecipativa e amministrazione condivisa”, in A. Valastro (eds), Le regole locali della democrazia partecipativa. Tendenze e prospettive dei regolamenti comunali. Napoli: Jovene, pp.229-239.

Argyris C., D. Schön (1996), Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Bardach E. (1998), Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship, Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

Boin, A., S. Kuipers, and W. Overdijk, (2013), “Leadership in times of crisis: A framework for assessment”, International Review of Public Administration, 18(1): 79-91.

Boin A., P. 't Hart, E. Stern, and B. Sundelius, (2017), The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure, (2nd ed.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Boin, A. and M. Lodge (2018), Enhancing the EU’s transboundary crisis management capacity: Recommendations for practice, London: TransCrisis Ltd.

Burns T., G. M. Stalker (1961), The management of innovation, London: Tavistock Publishing.

Busch N. E., A. D. Givens (2012), “Public-Private Partnerships in Homeland Security: Opportunities and Challenges”, Homeland Security Affairs, 8(1): 1-25.

Buse K., G. Walt (2000), “Global public-private partnerships: part I- a new development in health?”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78: 549-561.

Campi A. (2020), “Nulla sarà come prima?”, in Idem (eds), Dopo. Come la pandemia può cambiare la politica, l’economia, la comunicazione e le relazioni internazionali, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

Clarke A. (1999), “A Practical Use of Key Success Factors to Improve the Effectiveness of Project Management”, International Journal of Project Management, 17 (3): 139-145.

Comfort, L. K., A. Boin, C.C. Demchak (eds.) (2010), Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.

Coleman J. S. (2005), Fondamenti di teoria sociale, Bologna: Il Mulino.

Dalton R.J. (2004), Democratic challenges, Democratic choices: The erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

de Nardis F. (2013), Sociologia politica. Per comprendere i fenomeni politici contemporanei, Milano: McGraw-Hill.

Della Rocca G. (2019), “L’amministrazione partecipata, dall’adempimento alla norma all’organizzazione per risultato”, La Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 1: 75-90.

Di Franco G. (2005), EDS: esplorare, descrivere e sintetizzare i dati, Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Duit A., V. Galaz, K. Eckerberg, J. Ebbesson (2010), “Governance, complexity, and resilience”, Global Environmental Change, 20 (3): 363-368.

Folke C., S. R. Carpenter, B.Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Chapin, and J. Rockström (2010), “Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability”, Ecology and society, 15(4) http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/

Herbane B. (2019), “Rethinking Organizational Resilience and Strategic Renewal in SMEs”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31 (5-6): 476-495.

Hood C. (1991), “A public management for all seasons?”, Public administration, 69(1), 3-19.

Keong F. W. F., L. Y. Mei (2010), “Sustainable development: the effect of adopting green technology on small and medium enterprises’(smes) business resilience and competitiveness”, International Conference on Business and Economic Research (Vol. 1).

Kettl D.F. (2003), “Contingent coordination: Practical and theoretical puzzles for Homeland security”, American Review of Public Administration, 33 (3): 253-277.

Kirschner U. (2011), Active citizenship in the planning process: Information management vs. creative participation, International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Lawrence, E., J. Lorsch (1967), Organization and Environment, Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

Lodge, M., K. Wegrich (2014), “Challenges to the State, Governance Readiness, and Administrative Capacities”, The Governance Report, Hertie School of Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Magatti M. (2013), “WELFARE 2020”, Fondazione Roma, Un modello italiano per il welfare. L’orizzonte dei beni di comunità. Report n. 5, pp. 12-16.

Mény Y., Y.Surel (2001), Democracies and the populist challenge, NY: Springer.

Moynihan D.P. (2009), “The network governance of crisis response: case studies of incident command systems”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19: 895-915.

Norris F., S. Stevens, B. Pfefferbaum, K. Wyche, and R. Pfefferbaum (2008), “Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness”, American journal of community psychology, 41.1-2: 127-150.

Polizzi E., T. Vitale (2017), “Governo collaborativo e catene relazionali di innovazione. Spunti a partire dal caso di Milano”, Quaderni di Rassegna Sindacale, 18 (2): 129-147.

Putnam R. (1993), La tradizione civica nelle regioni italiane, Milano: Mondadori.

Ramus T., A. Vaccaro, S. Brusoni (2017), “Institutional complexity in turbulent times: Formalization, collaboration, and the emergence of blended logics”, Academy of Management Journal, 60(4): 1253-1284.

Tillement S., C. Cholez, T. Reverdy (2009), “Assessing organisational resilience: an interactionist approach”, Management, 12: 230-265.

Ventura S. (2020), “La pandemia e la crisi della leadership: come il Covid-19 può cambiare le democrazie”, in A. Campi (eds), Dopo. Come la pandemia può cambiare la politica, l’economia, la comunicazione e le relazioni internazionali, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

Walker B., D. Salt (2012), “Resilience practice: building capacity to absorb disturbance and maintain function”, Washington: Island press.

Weick K. E., K. M. Sutcliffe (2001), Managing the unexpected (Vol. 9), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Weick K. E., K. M. Sutcliffe (2011), Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 8), New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Wilson, D. C., P. Jarzabkowski (2004), “Thinking and acting strategically: New challenges for interrogating strategy”, European Management Review, 1(1): 14-20.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.