City-Level Action in a City-Wide Urban Commons. Amsterdam, 1977-1983


Abstract


In the late 1970s, Amsterdam's squatted domain grew to comprise hundreds of buildings, and a city wide network of workspaces, bars, cultural venues and other infrastructure. The squatted domain, as it developed at the time, can be viewed as an urban commons. For a section of the squatting community, the whole was far greater than merely the sum of its parts, which led to the creation of a horizontal, city level organization. Commoning strategies applied at the city level were organizing squatting days, setting up a collective process for legalization, and promoting alternative urban development. However, evictions prompted confrontational action and a number of groups adopted a confrontational identity. Operating outside the city-level organization, autonomous action teams formed. They perfected the skills involved in the defense of squats, and had informal leaders. Nevertheless, groups with both prefigurative and confrontational collective identities worked together, despite the cooperation being tenuous. The upshot was that a large number of squatter collectives were never evicted, but that squats were legalized instead.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v13i3p1324

Keywords: city level action; collective identity; protest; resistance; self-management; squatters; squatting; urban commons; urban movement; urban planning

References


Adilkno (1994), Cracking the Movement. Squatting Beyond the Media, New York: Autonomedia.

Arjen, Bas, Carin, Daan, Ellen, Eveline, Frank, Geert, Geert, Gerrit, Hanna, Herman, Jaap, Maarten, Marlene, Nanneke, Nico, Ottoline, Rob, Ton, and Wolter (1983a), Halte Jan Luykenstraat. Stilstaan bij de Lucky Luyk en weer verder. Deel 1, Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Lont.

Arjen, Bas, Carin, Daan, Ellen, Eveline, Frank, Geert, Geert, Gerrit, Hanna, Herman, Jaap, Maarten, Marlene, Nanneke, Nico, Ottoline, Rob, Ton, Wolter, and Peter (1983b), Vier handen op één Luyk. Stilstaan bij de Lucky Luyk en weer verder. Deel 2, Amsterdam, Uitgeverij Lont.

Bakker, F. G. A. de, F. den Hond, and M. Laamanen (2017),”Social Movements: Organizations and Organizing”, in B. Klandermans, and C, Roggeband (eds.), Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines, New York, Springer, pp. 203-232

Bauwens, M., and V. Niaros (2017), Changing Societies through Urban Commons Transitions, P2P Foundation. http://commonstransition.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Bauwens-Niaros-Urban-Commons-Transitions.pdf retrieved 14-10-2019.

Bedau, H. A. (1961), “On Civil Disobedience”, The Journal of Philosophy 58(21): 653-665.

Blom, J., S. van Houcke, T. Liefering, and H. Verrijn Stuart (1980), De Vondelstraat. Verslagen van Radio Stad. 29 februari - 3 maart 1980, Amsterdam: Van Gennep.

Breek, P., and F. de Graad (2001), Laat duizend vrijplaatsen bloeien. Onderzoek naar vrijplaatsen in Amsterdam, Amsterdam: De Vrije Ruimte.

Breines, W. (1980), “Community and Organization: The New Left and Michels' ‘Iron Law’, Social Problems, 27(4): 419-429.

De stad was van ons (1998), De stad was van ons. 28 vraaggesprekken met krakers en kraaksters, Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Snotneus.

Duivenvoorden, E. (2000), Een voet tussen de deur. Geschiedenis van de kraakbeweging 1964-1999, Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.

Feliciantonio, C. di (2017), “Spaces of the Expelled as Spaces of the Urban Commons? Analysing the Re-Emergence of Squatting Initiatives in Rome”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(5): 708–725.

Foster, S.R., and C. Iaione (2016), “The City as a Commons”, Yale Law & Policy Review, 34(2): 281-349.

Freeman, J. (1972), “The tyranny of structurelessness”, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 17(1): 151-164.

Gamson, W. A. (1975), The strategy of social protest, Homewood: The Dorsey Press.

Geen beschouwing maar verbouwing (1979), Uitingen van de aktiegroep. Amsterdam

Gezamenlijke Kraakgroepen (1979), Handleiding voor krakers, 5e druk, Amsterdam.

Giugni, M. G. (1998), “Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements”, Annual review of sociology, 98: 317-393.

Harvey, D. (2012), Rebel cities : from the right to the city to the urban revolution, London: Verso.

Huijsman, C. (1989), Meer mannen, minder mensen. De participatie van vrouwen in de kraakbeweging in de periode 1978-1984 in Amsterdam, MA Thesis Department of Sociology. Amsterdam, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

Jasper, M. (2004), “A Strategic Approach To Collective Action: Looking For Agency In Social-Movement Choices”, Mobilization: An International Journal, 9(1): 1-16.

Kimmel, J., T. Gentzsch and S. Bloemen, (2018), Urban Commons Shared Spaces, Berlin-Amsterdam: Commons Network & raumlaborberlin, Commonsnetwork.org, retrieved 3-7-2020

Koopmans, R. (2007), “Protest in Time and Space: The Evolution of Waves of Contention”, in D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 19–46.

Kriesi, H., R. Koopmans, J. W. Duyvendak, and M. Guigni. (1995), New Social Movements in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis, London: UCL Press.

Martínez, M. (2019), “Good and Bad Squatters? Challenging Hegemonic Narratives and Advancing Anti-capitalist Views of Squatting in Western European Cities”, Culture Unbound, (11)1, 165–189, http://www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.se.

Martínez, M. (2020), Squatters in the Capitalist City. Housing, Justice, and Urban Politics. New York: Routledge.

McGuirk, J. (2015), “Urban commons have radical potential – it's not just about community gardens”, The Guardian, 15 June, https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/jun/15/urban-common-radical-community-gardens, accessed 5-9-2019.

Melucci, A. (1989), Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society, London: Hutchinson Radius.

Noort, W. v. (1988), Bevlogen bewegingen. Een vergelijking van de anti-kernenergie, kraak- en milieubeweging, Amsterdam: SUA.

Ostrom, E. (2010), “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems”, American Economic Review, 100(3), 641-672.

Piazza, G., and V. Genovese (2016), “Between political opportunities and strategic dilemmas: the choice of ‘double track’ by the activists of an occupied social centre in Italy”, Social Movement Studies, 15(3): 290-304.

Piven, F. F. and R. A. Cloward (1977), Poor people's movements. Why they succeed, how they fail, New York: Pantheon Books.

Polletta, F., and J. M. Jasper (2001), “Collective Identity and Social Movements”, Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1): 283–305.

Pruijt, H. (2003), “Is the institutionalization of urban movements inevitable? A comparison of the opportunities for sustained squatting in New York City and Amsterdam”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(1), 133-157.

Pruijt, H. (2012), “InterviewStreamliner, a Minimalist, Free, Open Source, Relational Approach to Computer-assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software”, Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 248-253

Pruijt, H. (2013a), “The Logic of Urban Squatting”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(1): 19-45.

Pruijt, H. (2013b) “Culture Wars, Revanchism, Moral Panics and the Creative City. A Reconstruction of a Decline of Tolerant Public Policy: The Case of Dutch Anti-squatting Legislation”, Urban Studies, 50(6), 1114-1129.

Pruijt, H. and C. Roggeband (2014), “Autonomous and/or Institutionalized Social Movements? Conceptual Clarification and Illustrative Cases”, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 55(2), 144 – 165.

Quarta, A. and T. Ferrando (2015), “Italian Property Outlaws: From the Theory of the Commons to the Praxis of Occupation”, Global Jurist, 15(3): 261–290.

Rijken, K. (2018), Van der Laan, biografie van een burgemeester, Amsterdam: Ambo Anthos.

Slokker, N. (1981), Handleiding Haalbaarheidsonderzoeken, Amsterdam: Pandenoverleg.

Snow, D. A. (2007), “Framing and Social Movements”, in G. Ritzer (ed.), Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Sociology, Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell Reference Online.

Stavrides, S. (2016), Common Space: The City as Commons, London: Zed.

Tarrow, S, (1994), Power in movement. Social movements, collective action and politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, V., and N. Van Dyke (2007), “Tactical repertoires of social movements”, in D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 262-293.

Twintigtal kraaksters en krakers (1982), Amsterdam Ontluykt. Huis aan huis krant uit de kraakbeweging, Amsterdam.

Wietsma, A., J. Vonk, and F. van der Burght (1982), Als je leven je lief is. Vraaggesprekken met krakers en kraaksters, Amsterdam: Lont.

Yates, L. (2015), “Rethinking prefiguration: Alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements”, Social Movement Studies, 14(1), 1–21.

Yin, R. K. (2009), Case Study Research. Design and Methods, Fourth Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.