Striking, Marching, Tweeting. Studying How Online Networks Change Together with Movements


Abstract


This article aims to achieve a better understanding of how online networks contribute to the organization and the symbolic production of social movements using big data coming from social media platforms. It traces and compares online social and semantic networks that emerged on Twitter during two protest events organized by the feminist Italian movement Non Una Di Meno (NUDM) – a national strike organized on March 8th, 2017 and a march organized on November 25th of the same year. Our results suggests that, over time, online networks created on Twitter remain sparse and centralized around the movement handle but that they continue to host an interactive dialogue between the movement, its activists, and supporters. Also, over time, participants to online conversations around NUDM tend to use Twitter to discuss different aspects of the mobilization – paying more attention to the spaces of the pro-test during the strike and to the issue of gender-based violence in November.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v11i2p394

Keywords: Social Movements; Digital Media; Online Networks; Integrative Power

References


Ackland R., M. O’Neill (2011), “Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement”, Social Networks, 33(3): 177-190.

Barash V. and Golder, S. (2011), “Twitter: Conversation, entertainment, and infor-mation, All in one network!”, in D.

Hansen, B. Shneiderman, and M.A. Smith (eds), Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World,

Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 143–164.

Bastos M., D. Mercea (2016), “Serial Activists: Political Twitter Beyond Influentials and the Twittetatiat”, New Media and Society, 18(10): 2359–2378.

Bennett L.W., A. Segerberg (2013), The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bennett L. W., and A. Segerberg (2014), “Three Patterns of Power in Technology-Enabled Contention”, Mobilization. An International Quarterly, 19(4): 421–439.

Castells M. (2012), Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Crossley A. D. (2015), Facebook Feminism: Social Media, Blogs, and New Technologies of Contemporary U.S. Feminism, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(2): 253-268.

della Porta D., A. Mattoni (2015), “Social Networking Sites in Pro-democracy and Anti-austerity Protests: Some Thoughts from a Social Movement Perspective”, in D. Trottier and C. Fuchs (eds.), Social Media, Politics and the State: Protests, Revolutions, Riots, Crime and Policing in the Age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, Routledge: London, pp. 39–65.

Diani M. (2015), The Cement of Civil Society. Studying Networks in Localities, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Diani M., I. Bison (2004), “Organizations, Coalitions, and Movements”, Theory and Society, 33 (3-4): 281–309.

Earl J. (2016), “Protest Online: Theorizing the Consequences of Online Engagement”, in L. Bosi, M. Giugni, and K. Uba (eds.), The consequences of social movements, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 363–400.

Freeman L. C. (2002 [1979]), “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarifications”, in J. Scott (ed.), Social Networks: Critical Concepts in Sociology (vol. I), London and New York: Routledge, pp. 238–263.

Gaby S., N. Caren (2012), “Occupy Online: How Cute Old Men and Malcolm X Recruited 400,000 US Users to OWS on Facebook”, Social Movement Studies, 11(3-4): 367-374.

Gamson W. (1992), Talking Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.

García-Albacete G., Y. Theocharis (2014), “Opprtunities and challenges in analysing twitter content: A comparison of the occupation movements in Spain, Greece and the US”, in M. Cantijoch, R. Gibson, and S. Ward (eds.), Analyzing social media data and web networks: New methods for political science, London: Palgrave, pp. 119-153.

González-Bailón S., J. Borge-Holthoefer, and Y. Moreno (2013), “Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest di Diffusion”, American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7): 943–965.

Himelboim I., M.A. Smith, L. Rainie, B. Shneiderman, C. Espina (2017), “Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis”, Social Media + Society, 3(1): 1-13.

Howard, P. N., M.M. Hussain (2013), Democracy’s Fourth Wave, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kavada A. (2013), “Internet cultures and protest movements: The cultural links be-tween strategy, organizing and online communication”, in B. Cammaerts, A. Mattoni and. P. McCurdy (eds.), Mediation and protest movements, Bristol: Intellect, pp. 75–94.

Kitchin R. (2014), The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences, London: Sage.

Mattoni A. (2012), Media Practices and Protest Politics: How Precarious Workers Mobilise, Farnham, England: Ashgate.

Mattoni A., E. Pavan (forthcoming 2018), “Activist media practices, alternative media and online digital traces. The case of YouTube in the Italian SNOQ movement”, in H. Stephansen and E. Treré (eds.), Citizen Media and Practice, Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.

Mattoni A., E. Treré (2014), “Media Practices, Mediation Processes, and Mediatization in the Study of Social Movements”, Communication Theory, 24 (3): 252–271.

Melucci A. (1996), Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meraz, S., Z. Papacharissi (2013), “Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt”, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166.

Padovani C., E. Pavan (2016), “Global Governance and ICTs: Exploring Online Govern-ance Networks Around Gender and Media”, Global Networks, 16 (3): 350-371.

Pavan E. (2014), “Embedding Digital Communications within Collective Action Net-works. A Multidimensional Network Perspective”, Mobilization. An international Quarterly, 19(4): 441–455.

Pavan E. (2017), “The integrative Power of Online Collective Action Networks Beyond Protest. Exploring Social Media Use in the Process of Institutionalization”, Social Movement Studies, 16 (4): 433-446.

Pavan E., M. Caiani (2017), “‘Not in My Europe’: Extreme Right Online Networks and Their Contestation of EU Legitimacy”, in M.

Caiani and S. Guerra (eds), Euroscepti-cism, Democracy and the Media. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 169-193.

Rogers R. (2013), Digital Methods, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rojas F. (2015), Big Data and Social Movement Research, Revised 30th May 2017, re-trieved 10th July 2017 (https://mobilizingideas.wordpress.com/2015/04/02/big-data-and-social-movement-research/).

Schradie J. (2015), 5 reasons why online Big Data is Bad Data for researching social movements, Revised 30th May 2017, retrieved 10th July 2017 (https://mobilizingideas.wordpress.com/2015/04/02/5-reasons-why-online-big-data-is-bad-data-for-researching-social-movements/).

Snow D., R. D. Benford (1988), “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Par- ticipant Mobilization”, in B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, and S. Tarrow (eds.), International Social Movement Research, Vol. I: From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures, Greenwich, London: Jai Press, pp. 197–217.

Tilly C. (1986), “European violence and collective action since 1700”, Social Research, 52: 714–747.

Tremayne M. (2014), “Anatomy of Protest in the Digital Era: A Network Analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street”, Social Movements Studies, 13(1): 110–126.

Wagner-Pacific R., J.W. Mohr, and R.L. Breiger (2015), “Ontologies, Methodologies, and New Uses of Big Data in the Social and Cultural Sciences”, Big data & society, 2(2): 1-11.

Wasserman S., K. Faust (1994), Social network analysis. Methods and applications, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.