A Critical Discourse Analysis of EU environmental education policies


Abstract


In January 2022, the European Commission released a Proposal for a Council Recommendation on learning for environmental sustainability, in which it recognised that “[w]e are at a critical point in time: human action has brought us close to causing irreparable damage to our planet” and that “collective and individual actions are urgently needed to place our society and economy on a sustainable path” (European Commission, 2022, p. 1). The proposal was then adopted by the Council of the European Union in June 2022 with the “Council Recommendation on learning for the green transition and sustainable development” (Council of the EU, 2022), which focused on the key role of education in addressing the climate crisis and on the importance of preparing learners for the future. This chapter aims to critically analyse the aforementioned Commission Proposal and the ensuing Council Recommendation, as well as the Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the proposal (European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, 2022a), in order to discuss the main linguistic, pedagogical and political issues emerging from an ecocritically-informed analysis.

 


DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v59p7

Keywords: Ecocritical Discourse Analysis; ecolinguistics; education for sustainability; education for sustainable development; green growth discourse.

References


Adami V. 2013, Culture, Language and Environmental Rights: The Anthropocentrism of English, in “Pólemos” 7 [2], pp. 335-355.

------ 2015, Rights of Humans/Rights of Nature: The Language of Environmental Rights in United Nations’ Documents, in Ward I. (ed.), Literature and Human Rights, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston, pp. 271-287.

Alexander R. J. 2009, Framing Discourse on the Environment: A Critical Discourse Approach, Routledge, New York.

Bianchi G., Pisiotis U. and Cabrera, M. 2022, GreenComp – The European sustainability competence framework, Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Brundtland G. 1987, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. United Nations General Assembly document.

Council of the EU 2022, Council Recommendation of 16 June 2022 on learning for the green transition and sustainable development. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022H0627(01)

Davis J. 2015, Young Children and the Environment: Early learning for the environment, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.

European Commission 2019, Communication from the Commission. The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:640:FIN

European Commission 2022, Proposal for a Council Recommendation on learning for environmental sustainability. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0011

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture 2021, Erasmus+ 2021-2027: enriching lives, opening minds through the EU programme for education, training, youth and sport. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/s/yGHc

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture 2022a, Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the proposal for a Council recommendation on learning for environmental sustainability. Learning for the green transition and sustainable development. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/02392

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture 2022b, 2023 annual work programme - "Erasmus+": the Union Programme for Education, Training, Youth and Sport. Publications Office of the European Union. https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/document/2023-annual-work-programme-erasmus-the-union-programme-for-education-training-youth-and-sport

Evans N. 2019, Teacher education and education for sustainability, in

Ferreira J.-A., Evans N., Davis J. and Stevenson R. (eds.), Learning to Embed Sustainability in Teacher Education. Springer Briefs in Education. Springer, Singapore, pp. 7-21.

Fenton-Glynn C. (ed.) 2019, Children’s Rights and Sustainable Development: Interpreting the UNCRC for future generations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Fill A. 1997, Ecolinguistics as a European Idea, in “The European Legacy” 2 [3], pp. 450-455.

Goatly A. 1996, Green Grammar and Grammatical Metaphor, or Language and the Myth of Power, or Metaphors We Die By, in “Journal of Pragmatics”, 25, pp. 537–560.

------ 2017, Metaphor and Grammar in the Poetic Representation of Nature, in “Russian Journal of Linguistics” 21 [1], pp. 48-72.

Halliday M. 2001, New Ways of Meaning: The Challenge to Applied Linguistics. [1990], in Fill A. and Mühlhäusler, P. (eds.), The Ecolinguistics Reader, Continuum, London and New York, pp. 175-202.

Jickling B. 2001, Environmental Thought, the Language of Sustainability, and Digital Watches, in “Environmental Education Research” 7 [2], pp. 167-180.

Ossewaarde M., and Ossewaarde-Lowtoo R. 2020, The EU’s Green Deal: A Third Alternative to Green Growth and Degrowth?, in “Sustainability” 12 [23], pp. 1-15.

Otto,S. and Pensini, P. 2017, Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour, in “Global Environmental Change” 47, pp. 88-94.

Peet J. 2009, Strong Sustainability for New Zealand: Principles and Scenarios, SANZ, Nakedize Ltd., New Zealand.

Schleppegrell M. J. 1997, Agency in Environmental Education, in “Linguistics and Education” 9 [1], pp. 49-67.

Siraj-Blatchford J., Smith K. C. and Samuelsson I. P. 2010, Education for sustainable development in the early years. OMEP, World

Organization for Early Childhood Education.

Stibbe A. 2015, Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By, Routledge, London and New York.

UNESCO 2021, Learn For Our Planet: A global review of how environmental issues are integrated in education. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377362

Van Leeuwen T. 2008, Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Web Pages

Learning for the green transition and sustainable development. European Commission. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/green-education/learning-for-the-green-transition (20.07.2023)

#EducationForClimate Community Manifesto. Education for Climate Coalition. https://education-for-climate.ec.europa.eu/community/about-why (20.07.2023)

Voyant Tools. https://voyant-tools.org/ (20.07.2023)


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.