Tackling Online Disinformation. The Construction of ‘Trustworthiness’ and ‘Best Practices’ in the European Commission Discourse on COVID-19


Over the last few decades, misleading healthcare information and deceptions with false claims, conspiracy theories (CTs) and consumer fraud have endangered public health on a global scale. More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by a substantial flow of false information and unceasing attempts by conspirators to influence debates in the official discourses, breeding on the fertile ground of people’s most basic anxieties and the present-day social and economic uncertainty. This paper investigates the discourse of the European Commission on disinformation in order to achieve institutional legitimation through the linguistic and discursive construction of ‘trustworthiness’, ‘credibility’, and ‘transparency’. The analysis considers the documents produced by the European Commission over the last few years (2018- 2021), to tackle the discourse that supports alternative views on official science. The results of the analysis reveal the EU discursive process of conceptualising ‘verifiably false or misleading information’ as ‘public harm’, while distancing it from the EU’s fight against disinformation’ that is discursively constructed as ‘the protection of the EU values’. In particular, the investigation will show how the lexical and phraseological interaction discursively removes the harmful potential of conspiracy theories activists, legitimises massive control measures as the most effective way to guarantee freedom of expression and pluralistic democratic debate, and empowers the EU’s image as the shield protecting the European citizens’ awareness and societal resilience (Flowerdew, Richardson 2018).

DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v47p331

Keywords: disinformation; discourse; Systemic Functional Linguistics; European Commission; EU values


Bauman Z. 1990, Thinking Sociologically, Blackwell, Oxford.

Baxby D. 1999. Edward Jenner's Inquiry After 200 Years, in “British Medical Journal” 318 [7180], p. 390.

Bhatia V.K. 1993, Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings, Routledge, London.

Bhatia V.K. 2008, Towards Critical Genre Analysis, in Bhatia V.K., Flowerdew J. and Jones R.H. (eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies, Routledge, London / New York, pp. 166-177.

Bhatia A. 2018, The Discursive Construction of Terrorism and Violence, in Flowerdew J. and Richardson J.E. (eds.) 2018, The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, Routledge, London, pp. 434-446.

Bloor M. and Bloor T. 2018, Systemic Functional Linguistics, in Flowerdew J. and Richardson J.E. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, Routledge, London, pp. 151-164.

Carey J.W. 1992, Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Culture, Routledge, London / New York.

Chang C.G. and Mehan H.B. 2006, Discourse in a Religious Mode: The Bush Administration’s Discourse in the War on Terrorism and its Challenges, in “International Pragmatics Association” 16, pp. 1-23.

Davidson D. and Gilbert H. 2012, Semantics on General Language, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston.

Demata M., Heaney D. and Herring S., 2018, Language and Discourse in Social Media: New Challenges, New Approaches, In “Altre Modernità” 10, pp. I-X.

Dubé E., Laberge C., Guay M., Bramadat P., Roy R. and Bettinger J.A. 2013, Vaccine Hesitancy: An Overview, in “Hum Vaccin Immunother” 9, pp. 1763-1773.

Facchinetti R., Palmer F. and Krug M. 2012, Modality in Contemporary English, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Fairclough, N. 1989, Language and power, Longman, New York.

Fairclough N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Polity, Cambridge.

Fairclough N. 2001, Language and Power, Pearson, Harlow.

Fairclough, N. 2005, Blair’s Contribution to Elaborating a New “Doctrine of International Community, in “Journal of Language and Politics” 4 [1], pp. 41–63.

Fairclough, N. 2012, Critical discourse analysis, in Gee J. and Handford M. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, Routledge, London, pp. 9–20.

Fairclough N. 2013, Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language, Routledge, London.

Flowerdew J. and Richardson J.E. (eds.) 2018, The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, Routledge, London.

Garzone G. 2013, Variation in the Use of Modality in Legislative. Focus on Shall, in “Journal of Pragmatics” 57, pp. 68-81.

Gelfert A. 2018, Fake News: A Definition, in “Informal Logic” 38 [1], pp. 84–117.

Graham P., Keenan T. and Dowd A.M. 2004, A call to Arms at the End of History: A Discourse – Historical Analysis of George W. Bush’s Declaration of War on Terror, in “Discourse & Society” 15 [2–3], pp. 199-221.

Halliday M.A.K. 1978, Language as Social Semiotic, Edward Arnold, London.

Halliday M.A.K. and Matthiessen C.M.I.M. 2013, Introduction to Functional Grammar, Routledge, London / New York.

Halliday M.A.K. and Matthiessen C.M.I.M. 2014, Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, Routledge, London / New York.

Halliday M.A.K. and Webster J.J. 2014, Text linguistics: The How and Why of Meaning, Equinox, Sheffield.

Hunston S. and Thompson G. 2003, Evaluation in Texts. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Kalsnes B. 2021, Fake News, In “Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication” https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-809 (14.01.2022)

Larson H.J., Cooper L.Z., Eskola J., Katz S.L. and Ratzan S. 2011, Addressing the Vaccine Confidence Gap, in “Lancet” 378, pp. 526–535.

Lazar A. and Lazar M.M. 2004, The Discourse of the New World Order: ‘Out-casting’ the Double Face of Threat, in “Discourse & Society” 15 [2–3], pp. 223–242.

Maillat D. and Oswald S. 2009, Defining manipulative discourse: The pragmatics of cognitive illusions, in “International Review of Pragmatics” 1, pp. 348–370.

Martin J.R. and White P.R.R. 2005, The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Martin G.R. and Rose D. 2007, Working with Discourse. Meaning Beyond the Clause, Continnum, London and New York.

Marwick A and Lewis R. 2016, Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online, Data & Society Research Institute, Data & Society (datasociety.net) (14.01.2022).

Orosz G., Krekó P., Paskuy B., Tóth-Király I., Bőhte B. and Roland-Lévy C. 2016, Changing Conspiracy Beliefs through Rationality and Ridiculing, in “Frontiers in Psychology” 7 [1525], pp. 1-9.

Ott B. and Cameron W. 2000, Intertextuality: Interpretive Practice and Textual Strategy, in “Critical Studies in Media Communication” 17 [4], pp. 429-446.

Schmid, P. and Betsch C. 2019, Effective Strategies for Rebutting Science Denialism in Public Discussions, in “Nature Human Behavior” 3, pp. 931-939.

Silberstein S. 2002, War of words: Language, politics and 9/11, Routledge, London.

Sinclair J.M. 2001, Preface, in: Ghadessy M. et al. (eds.), Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. vii-xv.

Stern A.M. and Markel H., 2005, The History of Vaccines and Immunization: Familiar Patterns, New Challenges, in “Health Affairs” (Millwood) 24[3], pp. 611-21.

Swales J.M. 1990, Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Thanh Le T., Andreadakis Z., Kumar A., Gomez Roman R., Tollefsen S. And Saville M. 2020, The COVID-19 Vaccine Development Landscape, in “Nature Reviews Drug Discovery” 19, pp. 305–306.

Tsui A. 1994, English Conversation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Ullah, K.S. Khan, M.J. Tahir, A. Ahmed and H. Harapan 2021, Myths and Conspiracy Theories on Vaccines and COVID-19: Potential Effect on Global Vaccine Refusals, in “Vacunas” 22 [2], pp. 93-97.

Umberti D. 2016, The real history of fake news, In “Colombia Journalism Review” https://www.cjr.org/special_report/fake_news_history.php (14.01.2022)

van Dijk, T.A. 1995, Ideological Discourse Analysis, in “New Courant” 4, pp. 135-161.

van Dijk T.A. 2011, Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, SAGE Publishing, US.

van Prooijen J.W. 2018, Empowerment as a Tool to Reduce Belief in Conspiracy Theories, in Uscinski J.E. (ed.), Conspiracy Theories and the People who Believe Them, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 432–442.

Wardle, C. and Derakhshan H. 2017, Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making, Council of Europe Report DGI, Strasbourg.

Williams C. 2006, Fuzziness in Legal English: What Shall we Do with Shall?, in Wagner A. and Cacciaguidi S. (eds.), Legal Language and the Search for Clarity: Practice and Tools, Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 237-263.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.