Institutional Communication Concerning the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Critical Discourse Analysis of WHO Director-General’s Speeches


Abstract


During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, institutional communication has been playing a crucial role. For instance, WHO (World Health Organization) has been involved in criticism concerning information related to the origins of the pandemic delivered or not in due time.1 Starting from this assumption, the study is aimed at investigating the WHO Director-General communication concerning news related to the pandemic through the analysis of speeches delivered by Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO Director-General, from 22nd January to 29th May 2020. From a methodological perspective, the approach of Critical Discourse Analysis will be adopted with particular emphasis on semantic / syntactic relations. Furthermore, the representation of social actors will be explored in order to better understand the roles played by both WHO and China in the news concerning the pandemic. In short, this work will try to explore the processes involved in the communication concerning the pandemic and the representations of the roles played by both WHO and China in order to understand legitimation strategies enacted by these two social actors.


DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v47p145

Keywords: discourse; power; legitimation; pandemic; social actors

References


Bathia A. 2006, Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Press Conferences, in “Discourse & Society”, 17[2], pp.173-203.

Berger P. and Luckmann T. 1966, The Social Construction of Reality, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

Chouliaraki L. 2005, The Soft Power of War: Legitimacy and Community in Iraq War Discourses, in Special issue of “Journal of Language and Politics” 4 [1], pp.1-10.

De Rycher A. and Mohd Don Z. 2013, Discourse and Crisis- Critical perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam

Fairclough N. 2012, Critical Discourse Analysis, in Gee J.P andHandford M. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Routledge, London, pp. 9-20.

Fairclough N. 2000, Language and Neo-Liberalism, in “Discourse & Society” 11[2], pp. 147-148.

Fairclough N. 2003, Analysing Discourse, Routledge, London.

Fowler R. 1991, Language in the News. Discourse and Ideology in the Press, Routledge,

London.

Maingueneau D. 2021, Discourse Analysis Faced with the Coronavirus Crisis: A Few

Thoughts, in “Bakhtiniana”, São Paulo, 16 [4], pp. 146-161.

Martín R.L.M. and Van Dijk T.A. 1997, There Was a Problem, and It Was Solved:

Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse,

in “Discourse & Society” 8 [4], pp. 523-566.

Musolff A., Breeze R., Kondo K. and Vilar-Lluch S. 2022, Pandemic and Crisis

Discourse. Communicating COVID-19 and Public Health Strategy, Bloomsbury

Publishing, London.

Tay D. 2022, COVID-19 Press Conferences Across Time: World Health Organization vs.

Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in Musolff A., Breeze R., Kondo K. and Vilar- Lluch S. (eds.), Pandemic and Crisis Discourse. Communicating COVID-19 and Public Health Strategy, London, Bloomsbury Publishing.

Van Dijk T. 2006, Discourse and Manipulation, in “Discourse & Society” 17 [3], pp. 359- 383.

Van Leeuwen T.J. and Wodak R. 1999, Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse Historical Analysis, in “Discourse Studies” 1 [1], pp. 83-118.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.