Email this article Discourses of Public Health-related Controversies. A Comparison between the Conspiracist Video Plandemic and the VIOXX Medical Scandal
Abstract
Conspiracy theories related to public health have been proliferating since the outbreak of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The release of the viral Plandemic video interview, where former National Cancer Institute scientist Judy Mikovits alleges that US public health institutions have planned and profited from the pandemic, falls within this phenomenon. The appeal of Plandemic potentially draws on documented episodes of unethical behaviour on the part of scientists and health institutions, raising questions as to what analogies and differences may exist between the representation of public health conspiracy theories and that of actual cases of medical science misconduct. To address these questions, the present study applies a qualitative, discourse analytical approach to compare Plandemic with a 2005 PBS interview to FDA Associate Director of Drug Safety-turned-whistleblower David Graham, whose work was instrumental in uncovering serious and sometimes fatal health risks linked to the use of painkiller Vioxx, withdrawn in 2004. Drawing on the assumption that both Mikovits and Graham used language to promote their standpoints, which inevitably involves a degree of persuasion and ideology, the analysis focuses on linguistic and textual features that can be used to convey ideological messages – such as lexical choices, actor representation, recurring themes, coherence and evidentiality – identifying and comparing them across the two interviews. Results reveal some points in common, for instance in the representation of involved actors, as well as profound differences involving, for example, argumentation and evidentiality strategies. The concluding section thus elaborates on how these results raise further questions concerning how close and credible the two interviews may be perceived by recipients who do not engage in fact-checking.
References
Ash A. 2016, Whistleblowing and ethics in health and social care. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London/Philadelphia.
Barkun M. 2015, Conspiracy theories as stigmatized knowledge, in “Diogenes” 62 [3-4], pp. 114-120.
Bhatia V.K., Flowerdew J., and Jones R.H. 2008, Approaches to Discourse Analysis, in Bhatia V.K., Flowerdew J., and Jones R.H. (eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 1-18.
Brenner M., 2004, April 1 (first published May 1996), The Man Who Knew Too Much, in “Vanity Fair”. https://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/1996/05/wigand199605 (27.09.2021).
Broder J.M. 1997, June 21, Cigarette Makers in A $368 Billion Accord to Curb Lawsuits And Curtail Marketing, in “The New York Times”. https://www.nytimes.com/1997/06/21/us/cigarette-makers-in-a-368-billion-accord- to-curb-lawsuits-and-curtail-marketing.html (27.09. 2021).
Cohen D. 2013, August 14, 10 famous/infamous whistleblowers, in “Politico”. https://www.politico.com/gallery/2013/08/10-famous-infamous-whistleblowers- 001083?slide=0 (27.09.2021).
Culliford E. 2020, May 8, Facebook, YouTube remove 'Plandemic' video with 'unsubstantiated' coronavirus claims, Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us- health-coronavirus-tech-video-idUSKBN22K077 (27.09.2021).
Donegan M. 2020, February 20, Harvey Weinstein went from untouchable to incarcerated. Thank #MeToo, in “The Guardian”. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/ 2020/feb/24/harvey-weinstein-untouchable-guilty-thank-me-too (27.09.2021).
Douglas K.M., Uscinski J.E., Sutton R.M., Cichocka A., Nefes T., Ang C.S. and Deravi F. 2019. Understanding Conspiracy Theories, in “Political Psychology”, 40 [1] pp. 3– 35.
Enserink M., Cohen J. 2020, May 8, Fact-checking Judy Mikovits, the controversial virologist attacking Anthony Fauci in a viral conspiracy video, in “Science”. https://www.science.org/news/2020/05/fact-checking-judy-mikovits-controversial- virologist-attacking-anthony-fauci-viral (28.09.2021).
Frenkel S., Decker B. and Alba D. 2020, May 21, How the ‘Plandemic’ Movie and Its Falsehoods Spread Widely Online, in “The New York Times”. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/20/technology/plandemic-movie-youtube- facebook-coronavirus.html (27.09.2021).
Gagnon M., and Perron A. 2019, Whistleblowing: A concept analysis, in “Nursing & Health Sciences” 22 [2], pp. 381-389.
Halliday M.A.K. and Matthiessen M.I.M. 2004, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Hooder Arnold, London/New York.
Horton R. 2004, Vioxx, the implosion of Merck, and aftershocks at the FDA, in “The Lancet” 364 [9450], pp. 1995-1996.
Kearney M.D., Chiang S.C. and Massey P.M. 2020, The Twitter origins and evolution of the COVID-19 “Plandemic” conspiracy theory, in “Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review” 1 [3]. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/the- twitter-origins-and-evolution-of-the-covid-19-plandemic-conspiracy-theory/ (29.09.2021).
Konkes C. and Foxwell-Norton K. 2021, Science communication and mediatised environmental conflict: A cautionary tale, in “Public Understanding of Science” 30 [4], pp. 470-483.
Lakoff A. 2015, Vaccine politics and the management of public reason, in “Public Culture”, 27 [3], pp. 419-425.
Latour B. 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lazić A., and Žeželj I. 2021, A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation, in “Public Understanding of Science” 30 [6], pp. 644-670.
Levin M., Weinstein H. 1999, October 30, Tobacco Firm Assails Film’s Allegation, in “Los Angeles Times”. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-oct-30-mn- 27824-story.html (27.09.2021).
McGoey L. 2009, Pharmaceutical Controversies and the Performative Value of Uncertainty, in “Science as Culture” 18 [2], pp. 151-164.
McGreal C. 2020, May 14, A disgraced scientist and a viral video: how a Covid conspiracy theory started, in “The Guardian”. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/14/coronavirus-viral-video- Plandemic-judy-mikovits-conspiracy-theories (29.09.2021).
Mowery D. C., Nelson R. R., Sampat B. N., and Ziedonis A. A. 2001, The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh– Dole act of 1980, in “Research policy” 30 [1], pp. 99-119.
PBS (Public Broadcasting Service) 2004, Investigation into Painkiller Vioxx (Transcript). https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/investigation-into-painkiller-vioxx (27.09.2021).
Rose J. 2017. Brexit, Trump, and post-truth politics, in “Public Integrity” 19 [6], pp. 555- 558.
Solomon D. H. 2009, Book Review: Poison pills: The untold story of the Vioxx drug scandal, in “The Journal of Clinical Investigation” 119 [3], p. 427.
Stubbs M. 1998, Language and the Mediation of Experience: Linguistic Representation and Cognitive Orientation, in F. Coulmas (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics, Blackwell, pp. 358-373.
van der Linden S., Roozenbeek J. and Compton J. 2020, Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19, in “Frontiers in Psychology” 11, pp. 1-7
van Dijk T.A. 2003, Ideología y discurso, Ariel, Barcelona.
van Dijk T.A. 2006, Discourse and manipulation, in “Discourse & Society” 17 [3], pp.
-383.
van Leeuwen T. 1996, The representation of social actors, in Caldas-Coulthard C.R. ad
Coulthard M. (eds.), Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis,
Routledge, London, pp. 32-70.
Williamson E. 2021, January 27, Rioters Followed a Long Conspiratorial Road to the
Capitol, in “The New York Times”. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/27/us/ politics/capitol-riot-conspiracies.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype =Article (27.09. 2021).
Wilson M. 2016, The New England Journal of Medicine: commercial conflict of interest and revisiting the Vioxx scandal, in “Indian Journal of Medical Ethics” 1 [3], p. 167.
Wolff G.G. 2020, Letter to the Editor, in “Vaccine” 38 [30], p. 4651.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
