Email this article Hegel nella caverna. Speculazioni sull’origine del linguaggio
Abstract
An ancient problem for human thought is that of explaining the conditions that allowed the development of language, along with the related issue of understanding the essential characteristics that distinguish it from animal communication systems. A recent article of significant influence is Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch (2002), which proposed that the essential characteristic of human language is its generative capacity, the ability to express and understand meaning using basic elements (such as morphemes and words) to produce new sentences. The article by Hauser and colleagues provoked many reactions, including negative ones, one of which is that of Jackendoff and Pinker (Jackendoff & Pinker, 2005). These authors identify the main characteristic of language not so much in its pure syntactic capacity but in its being more specifically a "discrete combinatorial system" (Pinker, 1994): in systems of this type, a finite number of discrete elements are chosen, combined, and permuted to create larger structures with properties distinct from those of their components. In contrast to Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch (2002), and also to Jackendoff & Pinker (2005), Pinker and Jackendoff (2005), in this article, I propose that the essential trait of human language, from which all others descend is, instead, what I will call referential freedom, that is, the ability that allows humans to talk about anything, not only of things, actions and events belonging to the present of the act of communication but also of their past and their future, as well as of things belonging to other places and spatio-temporal realities. In fact, a language characterized by a discrete combinatorial system, or even by a combinatorial complexity generated by syntactic recursiveness, would be utterly useless if the communicative act were closely linked to the here and now of the present. Furthermore, I will examine the neuro-cognitive conditions that may have allowed humans to develop referential freedom and, more generally, representational detachment from the present.
References
Agamben G. 1982, Il linguaggio e la morte, Einaudi, Torino.
Ambrose S.H. 2001, Paleolithic technology and human evolution, in “Science” 291, pp. 1748-1753.
Baars B.J. 1997, In the theatre of consciousness: Global Workspace Theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness, in “Journal of Consciousness Studies” 4 [4], pp. 292-309.
Baars B.J. e Franklin S. 2003, How conscious experience and working memory interact, in “Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 7 [4], pp. 166-172.
Baddeley A.D. 1993, Working memory or working attention?, in Baddeley A.D. and Weiskrantz L. (a cura di), Attention: Selection, Awareness, and Control: a Tribute to Donald Broadbent, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 152-170.
Baddeley A.D. 2000, The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?, in “Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 4, pp. 417-423.
Baddeley A.D. 2001, Is working memory still working?, in “American Psychologist” 11, pp. 851-864.
Baddeley A.D. e Logie R.H. 1999, Working memory: the multiple-component model, in Miyake A. e Shah P. (a cura di), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 28-61.
Bar-Yosef O. 2002, The Upper Paleolithic revolution, in “Annual Review of Anthropology” 31, 363-393.
Berwick R.C. e Chomsky N. 2011, The biolinguistic program: The current state of its development, in Di Sciullo A.M. e Boeckx C. (a cura di), The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 19-41.
Berwick R.C. e Chomsky N. 2016, Why Only Us: Language and Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Bickerton D. 2009, Adam’s Tongue, Hill and Wang, New York.
Boë L.-J., Sawallis T.R., Fagot J., Badin P., Barbier G., Captier G., Ménard L., Heim J.-L. e Schwartz J.-L. 2019, Which way to the dawn of speech? Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech science, in “Science Advances” 5 [12], eaaw3916.
Byrne R. e Whiten A. 1985, Tactical deception of familiar individuals in baboons (Papio ursinus), in “Animal Behaviour” 33 [2], pp. 669-673.
Carruthers P. 1996, Language, Thought and Consciousness. An essay in philosophical psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Chomsky N. 2011, Language and Other Cognitive Systems. What Is Special About Language?, in “Language Learning and Development” 7 [4], pp. 263-278.
Chomsky N. 2016, The language capacity: Architecture and evolution, in “Psychonomic Bulletin & Review” 24, pp. 200-203.
Clayton N.S., Bussey T.J. e Dickinson A. 2003, Can animals recall the past and plan for the future?, in “Nature Reviews Neuroscience” 4, pp. 685-691.
Coolidge F.L. e Wynn T. 2005, Working Memory, its Executive Functions, and the Emergence of Modern Thinking, in “Cambridge Archaeological Journal” 15 [1], pp. 5-26.
Damasio A.R. 1999, The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt and Company, Inc, New York.
Deacon T. 1997, The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain, Norton, New York.
Dehaene S., Al Roumi F., Lakretz Y., Planton S. e Sablé-Meyer M. 2022, Symbols and mental programs: a hypothesis about human singularity, in “Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 26 [9], pp. 751-766.
Dehaene S. e Changeux J.P. 2011, Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing, in “Neuron” 70 [2], pp. 200-227.
Dehaene S. e Naccache L. 2001, Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework, in “Cognition” 79 [1–2], pp. 1–37.
Dennett D. 1991, Consciousness Explained, Little, Brown & Company, New York.
Dienes Z. e Perner J. 1999, A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge, in “Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 22 [5], pp. 735–808.
Eco U. 1975, Trattato di Semiotica Generale, Bompiani, Milano.
Edelman G. 1990, The Remembered Present. A biological theory of consciousness, Basic Books, New York.
Edelman G. e Tononi G. 2001, A Universe of Consciousness. How matter becomes imagination, Gardners, New York.
Emery N.J. e Clayton N.S. 2001, Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays, in “Nature” 414, pp. 443-446.
Engle R.W., Kane M.J. e Tuholski S.W. 1999, Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us abut controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex, in Miyake A. e Shah P. (a cura di), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 28-61.
Fitch W.T., Hauser M.D. e Chomsky N. 2005, The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications, in “Cognition” 97 [2], pp. 179-210.
Gardner R.A. e Gardner B.T. 1969, Teaching Sign Language to a Chimpanzee, in “Science” 165, pp. 664-672.
Hauser M., Chomsky N. e Fitch W.T. 2002, The language faculty: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?, in “Science” 298, pp. 1569-1579.
Hauser M.D., Yang C., Berwick R.C., Tattersall I., Ryan M.D., Watumull J. e Lewontin R.C. 2014, The mystery of language evolution, in “Frontiers in Psychology” 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401/full (14.12.2022).
Heberlein M.T. E., Manser M.B e Turner D.C. 2017, Deceptive-like behaviour in dogs (Canis familiaris), in “Animal Cognition” 20 [3], pp. 511-520.
Hegel G.W.F. 1931, Jeneser Realphilosophie II. Die Vorlesungen von 1805-1806, Leipzich.
Hegel G.W.F. 1971, Werke in zwanzig Bänden: Band III: Phänomenologie des Geistes.
Hockett C. 1960, The origin of speech, in “Scientific American” 203, pp. 88-96.
Jackendoff R. 2011, What is the human language faculty? Two views, in “Language” 87 [3], pp. 586-624.
Jackendoff R. e Pinker S. 2005, The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, & Chomsky), in “Cognition” 97 [2], pp. 211-225.
Kane M.J. e Engle R.W. 2000, Working memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval, in “Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition” 26, pp. 333-358.
Kane M.J. e Engle R.W. 2002, The role of the prefrontal cortex in working memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective, in “Psychonomic Bulletin & Review” 9, pp. 637-671.
Klein R. 2000, Archeology and the evolution of human behavior, in “Evolutionary Anthropology” 9, pp. 17-36.
Lau H.C. e Rosenthal D. 2011, Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness, in “Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 15 [8], pp. 365-373.
Lieberman P. 2007, The evolution of human speech: Its anatomical and neural bases, in “Current Anthropology” 48, pp. 39-66.
Lieberman P. 2016, The evolution of language and thought, in “Journal of Anthropological Sciences” 94, pp. 127-146.
Lieberman P. e Crelin E.S. 1971, On the speech of Neanderthal man, in “Linguistic Inquiry” 2, pp. 203-222.
McCrone J. 1991, The ape that spoke: Language and the evolution of the human mind, William Morrow, New York.
Mellars P. 1989, Major issues in the emergence of modern humans, in “Current Anthropology” 30 [3], pp. 349-385.
Mithen S. 1996, The Prehistory of the Mind, Thames and Hudson, London.
Newell A. e Simon H.A. 1972, Human Problem Solving, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Peirce C. 1931-1935, Collected Papers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Pinker S. 1994, The Language Instinct, W. Morrow and co., New York.
Pinker S. e Jackendoff R. 2005, The faculty of language: What’s special about it?, in “Cognition” 95 [2], pp. 201-236.
Premack D. e Woodruff G. 1978, Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?, in “Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 1 [4], pp. 515-526.
Rosenthal D. 2012, Higher-order awareness, misrepresentation and function, in “Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences” 367 [1594], pp. 1424-1438.
Rossano M.J. 2003, Expertise and the evolution of consciousness, in “Cognition” 89, pp. 207-236.
Russell J. 1996, Development and evolution of the symbolic function: the role of working memory, in Mellars P. e Gibson K. (eds.), Modelling the Early Human Mind, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, pp. 159-177.
Schlenker P., Chemla E., Schel A.M., Fuller J., Gautier J.-P., Kuhn J., Veselinović D., Arnold K., Cäsar C., Keenan S., Lemasson A., Ouattara K., Ryder R. e Zuberbühler K. 2016, Formal monkey linguistics, in “Theoretical Linguistics” 42 [1-2], pp. 1-90.
Shea N. e Frith C.D. 2019, The global workspace needs metacognition, in “Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 23[7]. https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(19)30099-3 (14.12.2022).
Shepard R.N. 1997, The genetic basis of human scientific knowledge, in Bock G.R. e Cardew G. (a cura di), Characterizing Human Psychological Adaptations, Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 4-13.
Thieme H. 1997, Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany, in “Nature” 385, pp. 807-810.
Wheeler B. 2009, Monkeys crying wolf? Tufted, in “Biological Sciences” 276 [1669], pp. 3013-3018.
Wynn T. 2002, Archaeology and cognitive evolution, in “Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 25, pp. 389-403.
Wynn T. e Coolidge F.L. 2004, The expert Neanderthal mind, in “Journal of Human Evolution” 46, pp. 467-487.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
