“But what’s so bad about inequality?” Ideological positioning and argumentation in the representation of economic inequality in the British press


Abstract


The aim of this chapter is to explore the discursive construction and representation of economic inequality in the British press in the period 2016-2019. For this purpose, the corpus consists of selected newspaper articles from three online newspapers The Guardian (liberal and left-leaning), The Telegraph and Daily Mail (traditionally conservative). A comparative analysis shows not only how the newspapers differ on the lexico-semantic and grammatical level in the discursive construction of key clusters around economic inequality, but also on the ideological argumentative level, in the way journalists position their ideas and engage their readers in order to defend and legitimize arguments. In their representation of economic inequality, the newspapers show through linguistic and argumentation analysis, whether they are aligned with the government, and as such broadly welcome greater wealth inequality, or whether, they actually resist current government policies. Hence, the main objective is to show how UK national newspapers have a double function in both reporting information, and also in construing an argument and aligning the reader to accept that argument. The methodological approach combines Corpus Linguistics (CL) with Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), informed by theories on epistemological and ideological positionings as forms of pragma-dialectical argumentation (van Eermeen 2017; White 2006).

DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v42p77

Keywords: argumentation; concur-concede counter patterns; ideological positioning; wealth inequality

References


Amossy R. 2009, The New Rhetoric’s inheritance. Argumentation and discourse analysis, in “Argumentation” 23, pp. 313-324.

Baker P. 2010, Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Baker, P. and McEnery T. 2015, Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora, Palgrave, London.

Baker P. and McEnery T. 2015, Who benefits when discourse gets democratised?: analysing a Twitter corpus around the British Benefits Street debate, in Baker P. and McEnery T. (eds.), Corpora and discourse studies: integrating discourse and corpora, Palgrave, London, pp. 244-265.

Baker P., Costas G. and McEnery T. 2013, Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press 1998–2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bednarek M. 2006, Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach, in “Text and Talk” 26 [6], pp. 635-660.

Bell A. 1998, The Discourse structure of News Stories, in Bell A. and Garrett P. (eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse, Blackwell, Oxford, Malden, pp. 64-104.

Breeze R. 2016, Negotiating alignment in newspaper editorials: The role of concur-counter patterns, in “Pragmatics” 26 [1], pp. 1-19.

Caldas-Coulthard C. R. and Moon R. 2010, ‘Curvy, hunky, kinky’: Using corpora as tools for critical analysis, in “Discourse & Society” 21 [2], pp. 99-133.

Cribb J., Johnson P., Joyce R. 2012, Jubilees compared: Incomes, spending and work in the late 1970s and early 2010s. “Institute of Fiscal Studies Briefing Note 128”.

Fairclough N. 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, Longman, London.

Fowler R. 1991, Language in the News, Routledge, Abington.

Gomez-Jimenez E. 2018, An insufferable burden on businesses? On changing attitudes to maternity leave and economic-related issues in the Times and Daily Mail, in “Discourse, Context & Media” 26, pp.100-107.

Greaves C. 2009, ConcGram 1.0. A phraseological search engine.

Halliday M.A.K. 1994, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Edward Arnold, London.

Heine J. and Ramesh T. (eds.) 2011, The dark side of globalization. Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI). United Nations University, Tokyo, New York. Paris.

Hoey M. 2005, Lexical Priming. A New Theory of Words and Language, Routledge, London.

Hunston S. 2001, Colligation, lexis, pattern and text, in Thompson G. and Scott M. (eds.), Patterns of text: In honour of Michael Hoey, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 13-33.

Kilgarriff A., Rychlý P., Smrž P. and Tugwell D. 2004, The sketch engine. “Information Technology”.

Kress G. 1994, Text and Grammar as Interpretation, in Meinhof U. and Richardson K. (eds.), Text, Discourse and Context: Representations of Poverty in Britain, Longman, London, pp. 24-47.

Martin J. R. and White P. R. R. 2005, The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Partington A. 2010, Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS) on UK Newspapers: an Overview of the Project, in “Corpora” 5 [2], pp. 83-108.

Perelman C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca L. 1969, The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

Piketty T. 2014, Dynamics of Inequality. “New Left Review” 85, pp. 103-116.

Salvi R. and Turnbull J. 2010, Appraisal theory as a methodological proposal for stylistic analysis in “Textus” 23 [1], pp. 103-138.

Simon Vandenbergen A. and Ajmer K. 2007, The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty Subtitle: A Corpus-based Study of English Adverbs, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Stiglitz J. 2012, The Price of Inequality, Allen Lane, New York, London.

Stubbs M. 1996, Text and Corpus Analysis, Blackwells, Oxford.

The Guardian, 17 March, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/17/french-government-unprepared-for-gilets-jaunes-riots-critics-say (11.04.2019).

Toolan M. 2018, The Language of Inequality in the News: A Discourse Analytic Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Toolan M. 2016, Peter Black, Christopher Stevens, class and inequality in the Daily Mail, in “Discourse & Society” 27 [6], pp. 642-660.

van Dijk T. A. 2015, Critical Discourse Analysis, in Tannen D., Hamilton H. E. and Schiffrin D. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 466-485.

van Dijk T.A. 1995, Discourse semantics and ideology, in “Discourse & Society” 6 [2], pp. 243-289.

van Dijk T. A. 1994, Discourse and Inequality, in “Lenguas Modernas” 21, Universidad de Chile, pp. 19-37.

van Eemeren F.H. 2017, Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective, in van Eemeren F.H. (ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns. Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context, Argumentation in Context 11, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 7-29.

Verschueren J. 2012, Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Watt P. 2008, ‘Underclass’ and ‘ordinary people’ discourses: Representing/re-presenting council tenants in a housing campaign in “Critical Discourse Studies” 5 [4], pp. 345-357.

White P.R.R. 2006, Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse – a new framework for analysis, in Lassen I. (ed.), Mediating Ideology in Text and Image: ten critical studies, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 37-69.


Full Text: pdf

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.