Email this article What consumers really feel about corporate apologies. A discourse analysis of reactions to apologies on economic and financial scandals in tweets
Abstract
The economic, financial and environmental crises that have involved many international companies over the past twenty years have been the concern of various disciplines, e.g. Genre Studies (Rutherford 2005; Zanola 2010), Critical Discourse Analysis (Howcroft 2012) and Crisis Communication (Coombs and Holladay 2012). Interestingly, the number of studies carried out in these academic areas have paid attention to the linguistic and discursive strategies adopted by managers to persuade their audience to trust them. In particular, they have focused on apologia and apology as activities of trust-building, while neglecting the audience’s actual reactions to corporations’ suasive attempts. These responses are remarkable in blogs, social networks, and other forms of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) genres (Puschmann 2010). Adopting an approach which integrates Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis (Herring 2001; Androutsopoulos, Beißwenger 2008), Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough 2003; van Dijk 2006) and Pragmatics (Austin 1962; Searle 1975), the paper focuses on the perlocutionary acts enacted in blogs, tweets and user-generated articles that respond to corporate apologies. In particular, it investigates how corporate scandals and wrongdoings are experienced by readers. To achieve this goal, the paper is carried out on a corpus consisting of tweets disputing the Volkswagen (VW) diesel scandal over the period 2015 to 2017. Findings show that customers tend to react with anger, disappointment and irony to the crisis communicative stances enacted by the VW management.
References
Androutsopoulos J. and Beißwenger M. 2008, Introduction: Data and Methods in Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis, in “Language@Internet” 5 (2008).
http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008 (21.6.2021).
Austin J.L. 1962, How To Do Things With Words, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Benoit W.L. 1995, Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration, State University of New York Press, Albany.
Benoit W.L. and Drew S. 1997, Appropriateness and effectiveness of image repair strategies, in “Communication Reports” 10, pp. 153-163.
Benoit W.L. and Pang A. 2008, Crisis communication and image repair discourse, in Hansen-Horn T.L. and Neff B.D. (eds.), Public relations: From theory to practice. Pearson, New York, pp. 243-261.
Blum-Kulka S. and Olshtain E. 1984, Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP), in “Applied Linguistics” 5 [3], pp. 196-213.
Cameron G.T., Pang. A. and Jin Y. 2008, Contingency theory, in Hansen-Horn T.L. and Neff B.D. (eds.), Public relations: From theory to practice, Pearson, New York, pp. 134–157.
Cheng Y. 2018, How Social Media Is Changing Crisis Communication Strategies: Evidence from the Updated Literature, in “Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management” 26 [1], p. 58-68.
Chung S. and Lee S. 2017, Crisis Management and Corporate Apology: The Effects of Causal Attribution and Apology Type on Publics’ Cognitive and Affective Responses, in “International Journal of Business Communication” 58 [1], pp. 125-144.
Coombs T.W. 2010, Parameters for Crisis Communication, in Coombs W.T. and Holladay S.J. (eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 17-53.
Coombs W.T. and Holladay S.J. 2008, Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: clarifying apology’s role and value in crisis communication, in “Public Relations Review” 34, pp. 252-257.
Coombs W.T. and Holladay S.J. (eds.) 2012, The Handbook of Crisis Communication, Wiley, Oxford.
Coombs W.T. and Holladay S.J. 1996, Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication, in “Journal of Public Relations Research”, 8 [4], pp. 279-295.
Fairclough N. 2003, Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, Routledge, London.
Falco G. 2017, Discourse Strategies in Governance Genres: How Corporations Manage Economic and Financial Crisis, in “CADAAD Journal” 10 [1], pp. 115-134.
Fediuk T., Coombs A.W.T. and Botero I.C. 2010, Exploring Crisis from a Receiver Perspective: Understanding Stakeholder Reactions During Crisis Events, in Coombs W.T. and Holladay S.J. (eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, London/Berlin, pp. 635-656.
Flew T., Bruns A., Burgess J.E., Crawford K. and Shaw F. 2013, Social media and its impact on crisis communication: Case studies of Twitter use in emergency management in Australia and New Zealand, in ICA Regional Conference: Communication and Social Transformation, 8-10 November 2013, Shanghai, China (unpublished).
Fuoli, M. and Hart C. 2018, Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study, in “Discourse & Society” 29 [5], pp. 514-552.
Fuoli M. and Paradis C. 2014, A model of trust-repair discourse, in “Journal of Pragmatics” 74, pp. 52-69.
Gruber H. 2017, Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse, in “Discourse, Context & Media” 20 (2017), pp. 1-9.
Hearit K.M. 2006, Crisis Management by Apology. Corporate Response to Allegations of Wrongdoing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey London.
Herring S. 2004, Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior, in Barab S.A., Kling, R. and Gray J.H. (eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 338-376.
Herring S. 2001, Computer-mediated discourse, in Schiffrin D., Tannen D. and Hamilton H.E. (eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 612-634.
Herring S., Stein D. and Virtanen T. 2013, Introduction to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication, in Herring S., Stein D. and Virtanen T. (eds.), Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin-Boston, pp. 3-32.
Hodgkin A. 2017, Following Searle on Twitter: How Words Create Digital Institutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Honeycutt C. and Herring S. 2009, Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter, in Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42), IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
Howcroft S. 2012, The Discourse of the European Financial Crisis from Different Perspectives, in “RUA-L” Revista da Universidade de Aveiro 1 [2], pp. 299-319.
Huang Y.H. 2006, Crisis situations, communication strategies, and media coverage: A multicase study revisiting the communicative response model, in “Communication Research” 33, pp. 180–205.
McDonald L.M., Sparks B. and Glendon I.A. 2010, Stakeholder reactions to company crisis communication and causes, in “Public Relations Review” 36 [3], pp. 263-271.
McDonald L. and Härtel C.E.J. 2000, Applying the involvement construct to organisational crises, in ANZMAC 2000 Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge, pp. 799-803.
Park J., Kim H., Cha M., Jeong J. 2011, CEO’s Apology in Twitter: A Case Study of the Fake Beef Labeling Incident by E-Mart, in Datta A., Shulman S., Zheng B., Lin SD., Sun A., Lim EP. (eds.), Social Informatics. SocInfo 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 6984.
Princeton University 2010, “About WordNet”. WordNet, Princeton University.
Puschmann C. 2010, The corporate blog as an emerging genre of computer-mediated communication: features, constraints, discourse situation, Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
Rasmussen J. and Ihlen, Øyvind 2017, Risk, Crisis, and Social Media. A systematic review of seven years’ research, in “Nordicom Review” 38 [2], pp. 1-17.
Rutherford B.A. 2005, Genre Analysis of Corporate Annual Report Narratives. A Corpus Linguistics–Based Approach, in “Journal of Business Communication” 42 [4], pp. 349-378.
Schiffrin A. 2005, Modelling Speech Acts in Conversational Discourse. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
Scott K. 2015, The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter, in “Journal of Pragmatics” 81, pp. 8-20.
Searle J.R. 1976, A Classification of Illocutionary Acts, in “Language in Society” 5 [1], pp. 1-23.
Searle. J.R. 1995, The Construction of Social Reality, The Free Press, New York.
Searle J. and Vanderveken D. 1985, Foundations of Illocutionary Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Swaminathan V. and Mah S. 2016, What 100,000 Tweets About the Volkswagen Scandal Tell Us About Angry Customers”, in “Harvard Business Review”. https://hbr.org/2016/09/what-100000-tweets-about-the-volkswagen-scandal-tell-us-about-angry-customers (21.6.2021).
Válková S. 2013, Speech acts or speech act sets: Apologies and compliments, in “Linguistica Pragensia” 23 [2], pp. 44-57.
Vosoughi S. and Roy D. 2016, Tweet Acts: A Speech Act Classifier for Twitter, in Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2016), pp. 711-714.
Wendling C., Radisch J. and Jacobzone S. 2013, The Use of Social Media in Risk and Crisis Communication, in “OECD Working Papers on Public Governance” 24, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Yus F. 2011, Cyberpragmatics. Internet mediated communication in context, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Zhang R., Gao D. and Li W. 2011, What Are Tweeters Doing: Recognizing Speech Acts in Twitter, in Analyzing Microtext: Papers from the 2011 AAAI Workshop (WS-11-05), San Francisco, California, USA, pp. 86-91.
Zhao X. and Jiang J. 2011, An empirical comparison of topics in twitter and traditional media, in “Singapore Management University School of Information Systems Technical Paper Series” 10, n.p.
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
