An embodied stylistics approach to acting interpreters’ exploration of Shakespeare’s verse drama. A case-study analysis


Abstract – This chapter explores the nature of poetry as a dramatic use of language, showing the relevance of Experientialist theories in Cognitive Linguistics to the empirical experience of acting Shakespeare’s verse out. The assumption is that an overt and collectively-shared embodiment of meanings, accomplished through the use of creative writing and drama techniques, can enhance the interpreters’ awareness of the formal and metaphorical characteristics of this poetic text. This also entails the interpreters’ rediscovery of the ‘embodied’ nature of their own ‘schemata’ (or background experience) at the source of their emotional and conceptual responses to the poetic language of Shakespearean characters. Interpreters are therefore defined as acting interpreters when they act poetry out in a real space, appropriate it into their own schematic identities as they embody and authenticate its meanings, and then analyze its effects on themselves and on the other acting interpreters inter-acting with them. Embodied Stylistics is therefore meant not as the analysis of the text as such but, instead, as the analysis of the acting interpreters’ responses to the poetic patterns of the text. This theoretical argument becomes actualized in the experience of ‘poetic meaning embodiment’ reported by the case-study subjects as ‘acting interpreters’ (some of them acclaimed British actors and stage directors) and an embodied-stylistic analysis will be carried out precisely on the ethnographic data collected during their creative-writing and poetic-drama workshops.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v27p221

Keywords: Embodied Stylistics; acting interpreters; embodied schemata; Shakespeare’s verse drama.


Anderson R.C. and Pearson P.D. 1984. A schema-theoretic view of the basic processes in reading comprehension, in Pearson P.D. (ed.), Handbook of Reading Research, Longman, New York, pp. 255-292.

Armstrong D.F., Stokoe W.C. and Wilcox S.E. 1995, Gesture and the Nature of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bachelard G. 1969, The Poetics of Space, Beacon Press, Boston.

Benjamin W. 1969. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, in Illuminations, Schocken, New York, pp. 1-26.

Berry C. 1991, The Actor and his Text, Virgin Books, London.

Brenkman J. 1984, Culture and Domination, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Brook P. 1990, The Empty Space, Penguin, London.

Chekhov M. 1953, To the Actor: On the Technique of Acting, Harper and Row, New York.

Cook G. 1994, Discourse and Literature, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cox C.B. and Dyson A.E. 1963, Modern Poetry: Studies in Practical Criticism, Edward Arnold, London.

Culler J. 2007, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

De Man P. 1979, Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke and Proust, Yale University Press, New Haven.

Derrida J. 1978, Writing and Difference, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Derrida J. 1988, The Ear of the Other, Bison Book, London.

Easthope A. 1983, Poetry as Discourse, Methuen, London.

Ericsson A.K. and Simon H.A. 1984, Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..

Genette G. 1976, Figure III: discorso del racconto, Einaudi, Turin.

Guido M.G. 1999, The Acting Reader: Schema/Text Interaction in the Dramatic Discourse of Poetry, Legas Publishing, New York/Ottawa/Toronto.

Guido M.G. 2005, The Imaging Reader: Visualization and Embodiment of Metaphysical Discourse, Legas Publishing, New York/Ottawa/Toronto.

Guido M.G. 2013, The Acting Interpreter: Embodied Stylistics in an Experiential Perspective, Legas Publishing, New York/Ottawa/Toronto.

Halliday M.A.K. 1994, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Arnold, London.

Halliday M.A.K. and Hasan R. 1989, Language, Context and Text, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Heidegger M. 1962, Being and Time, Blackwell, Oxford.

Henle P. 1958, Metaphor, in Henle P. (ed.), Language, Thought, and Culture, Michigan University Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 173-195.

Hillis Miller J. 1975, Deconstructing the deconstructiors, in “Diacritics” 5, pp. 24-31.

Hintikka J. 1989. Exploring Possible Worlds, in Allen S. (ed.), Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium 65, de Gruyter, New York/Berlin, pp. 52-73.

Johnson M. 1987, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.

Johnstone K. 1981, Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre, Methuen, London.

Lakoff G. 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

Lakoff G. and Johnson M. 1999, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, Basic Books, New York.

Linklater K. 1992, Freeing Shakespeare’s Voice: The Actor’s Guide to Talking the Text, Theatre Communications Group, New York.

McNeill D. 1992, Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Nietzsche F. 1956, The Birth of Tragedy, Anchor Books, New York.

Nietzsche F. 2009, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Thrifty Books, Auburn.

Nisbett R.E. and Wilson T.D. 1977, Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes, in “Psychological Review” 84, pp. 231-259.

van Peer W. (ed.) 1989, The Taming of the Text: Explorations in Language, Literature and Culture, Routledge, London.

Ricoeur P. 1978, The metaphorical process of cognition, imagination, and feeling, in Sacks S. (ed.), On Metaphor, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 143-159.

Rumelhart D.E. 1977, Toward an interactive model of reading, in Dornic S. (ed.), Attention and Performance VI, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 573-603.

Samuels S.J. and Kamil M.L. 1984, Models of the reading process, in Pearson D. (ed.), Handbook of Reading Research, Longman, London, pp. 793-811.

Sartre J.P. 1948, Qu’est-ce que la littérature?, Gallimard, Paris.

Stalnaker R. 2001, On considering a Possible World as actual, in “Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society” 65, pp. 141-156.

Stanislavski K. 1981, Creating a Role, Methuen, London.

Studdert-Kennedy M. 1987, The phoneme as a perceptuomotor structure, in Allport D.A. (ed.), Language Perception and Production: Relationships between Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing, Academic Press, London, pp. 67-84.

Todorov T. 1980, Reading as construction, in Suleiman S. and Crosman I. (eds.), The Reader in the Text: Essays on Audience and Interpretation, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp. 67-82.

Widdowson H.G. 1982, Othello in person, in Sinclair J. (ed.), Language and Literature, Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 41-52.

Widdowson H.G. 1992, Practical Stylistics: An Approach to Poetry, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Widdowson H.G. 1993, Getting in on the act. The representation of reality in drama, mimeo, Institute of Education, University of London, London.

Full Text: pdf


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.