Migration – What is in a word


Abstract


Abstract – Given the present climate of heated political debate and social tension over the question of migration, the aim of this study is to investigate how the topic is represented to the general public. The study will examine texts from the British press and from blogs of migration organizations and research centres. The research centres offer themselves as a medium for intelligent discourse on migration and their intent is to bring this discussion out of academia and into an accessible forum for anyone interested in the question. They will therefore give a different perspective to the linguistic landscape of migration from the more politically coloured discourse of the press. The study first uses corpus linguistic methods to examine how migration is represented linguistically in the two subcorpora and then the Appraisal Theory for a qualitative analysis of some extracts from the texts. The analyses show that both the blogs and the press do not use primarily attitudinal lexis, preferring other linguistic resources, such as dialogistic positioning, intensification and evoked evaluation.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i22390359v25p45

Keywords: migration; UK press; migration organizations and research centres; quantitative analysis; Appraisal Theory

References


Allen W.L. 2016, A Report. A Decade of Immigration in the British Press. The Migration Observatory, University of Oxford, www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk (27.11.2017).

Baker P. 2006, Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis, Continuum, London.

Baker P., Gabrielatos C., Khosravinik M., Krzyzanowski M., Enery T. and Wodak R. 2008, A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, in “Discourse and Society” 19 [3], pp. 273-306.

Balabanova E. and Balch A. 2010, Sending and Receiving: The Ethical Framing of Intra-EU Migration in the European Press, in “European Journal of Communication” 25 [4], pp. 382-397.

Blinder S. and Allen W.L. 2016, Constructing immigrants: portrayals of migrant groups in British national newspapers, 2010-2012, in “International Migration Review” 50 [1], pp. 3-40.

Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM) 2018, Homepage. http://www.cream-migration.org/- (5.3.2018).

Cunningham-Parmeter K. 2011, Alien language: Immigration metaphors and the Jurisprudence of Otherness, in “Fordham Law Review” 79 [1], pp. 1545-1598.

Economist 2016, Migration worries in America and Britain. January 29, 2016. www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/01/public-opinon-and-immigration (13.11.2017).

Gabrielatos C. and Baker P. 2008, Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: a corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996-2005, in “Journal of English Linguistics” 36 [1], pp. 5-38.

Incelli E. 2013, Shaping reality through metaphorical patterns in legislative texts on immigration: a corpus assisted approach, in Williams C. and Tessuto G. (eds.) Language in the Negotiation of Justice. Contexts, issues and Applications, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, pp. 235-256.

Lakoff G. 2006, The framing of Immigration, Rockridge Institute. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/Oj89f85g (3.11.2017).

Martin J.R. and White P.P.R. 2005, The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Martínez Guillem S. 2013, Constructing contexts, (re)defining immigrants: mental models and social representations in immigration policy defense, in “Discourse & Society”, 24, pp. 208-228.

Martínez Guillem S. 2015, Migration discourse. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/

1002/9781118611463.wbielsi100/pdf (3.11.2017).

Salvi R. 2017, The discursive construction of trust in European political communication, in Salvi R. and Turnbull J. (eds.), The Discursive Construal of Trust in the Dynamics of Knowledge Diffusion, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, pp. 2-23.

Salvi R. and Turnbull J. 2010, Appraisal theory as a methodological proposal for stylistic analysis, in “Textus” 1, pp. 103-138.

Turnbull J. 2013, The blogs of the European Commission: public-private space in a professional institutional context, in “Textus” 1, pp. 149-160.

Van Dijk T.A. 1996, Discourse, power and access, in Caldas-Coulthard C. and Coulthard M. (eds.), Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Routledge, London, pp. 84-104.

Van Dijk T.A. 1998, Opinions and ideologies in the press, in Bell A. and Garnett R. (eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 21-63.

White P.P.R. 2015, Appraisal Theory, in Tracy K., Ilie C. and Sandel T. (eds.), The International Encyclopaedia of Language and Social Interaction, Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, pp. 1-8, http://www.prrwhite.info/prrwhite (20.10.2017).


Full Text: pdf

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.