Why not talk about repression? Radical Activism and its Responses to Repression


Abstract


By exploring silence as a response to repression, this study contributes to the literature on the dynamic rela-tionship between protest and repression; it examines the ways in which certain radical activists responded with silence to the escalating repression they were experiencing. Analysis explains how and why they remained si-lent, and the consequences of that silence for individual activists and collective mobilization. Based on a case study of the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) campaign in the UK, this article includes the reflections of activists who experienced repression first-hand. By analysing in-depth interviews and other qualitative data, the study identifies four different forms of silence among the activists facing repression: silence as a strategy, si-lence as a cultural trait, silence due to over-confidence and silence resulting from the normalization of repres-sion. The results show how cultural and strategic dynamics play out in protestors' experiences of and responses to repression. The study demonstrates the importance of the neglected research area of the response to re-pression for advancing our understanding of the conditions under which repression leads either to demobiliza-tion or to mobilization.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v14i1p480

Keywords: Demobilization; Movement Culture; Repression; SHAC; Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty

References


Alimi, E.Y., C. Demetriou, and L. Bosi (2015), The Dynamics of Radicalization: A Relational and Comparative Perspective, New York: Oxford University Press.

Bosi, L., C. Demetriou, and S. Malthaner (eds. 2015), Dynamics of Political Violence, Farnham: Ashgate.

Braun, V., V. Clarke (2008), ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101.

Carey, S.C. (2006), ‘The Dynamic Relationship between Protest and Repression’, Political Research Quarterly, 59(1): 1–11.

Chang, P.Y. (2008), ‘Unintended Consequences of Repression: Alliance Formation in South Korea’s Democracy Movement (1970–1979)’, Social Forces, 87(2): 651–677.

Christensen, A-D. (2010), ‘Resistance and Violence: Constructions of Masculinities in Radical Left-Wing Movements in Denmark’, Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies, 5(2): 151–168.

Combes, H., O. Fillieule (2011), ‘Repression and Protest Structural Models and Strategic Interactions’, Revue française de science politique, 61(6): 1047–1072.

Davenport, C. (2015), How Social Movements Die: Repression and Demobilization of the Republic of New Africa, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

della Porta, D. (2006), Social Movements, Political Violence and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Germany and Italy, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

della Porta, D. (2014), ‘On Violence and Repression: A Relational Approach’, Government and Opposition, 49(2): 159–187.

Doherty, B., G. Hayes (2014), ‘Having Your Day in Court: Judicial Opportunity and Tactical Choice in Anti-GMO Campaigns in France and the United Kingdom’, Comparative Political Studies, 47(1): 3–29.

Donovan, J., R.T. Coupe (2013), ‘Animal Rights Extremism: Victimization, Investigation and Detection of a Campaign of Criminal Intimidation’, European Journal of Criminology, 10(1): 113–132.

Duyvendak, J.W., O. Fillieule (2015), ‘Patterned Fluidity: An Interactionist Perspective as a Tool for Exploring Contentious Politics’, in J.M. Jasper, J.W. Duyvendak (eds.), Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 295–318.

Earl, J. (2003), ‘Tanks, Tear Gas, and Taxes: Toward a Theory of Movement Repression’, Sociological Theory, 21(1): 44–67.

Earl, J. (2006), ‘Introduction: Repression and the Social Control of Protest’, Mobilization: An International Journal, 11(2): 129–143.

Earl, J. (2011), ‘Political Repression: Iron Fists, Velvet Gloves, and Diffuse Control’, Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1): 261–284.

Ellefsen, R. (2016), ‘Judicial Opportunities and the Death of SHAC: Legal Repression along a Cycle of Contention’, Social Movement Studies, 15(5): 441–456.

Ellefsen, R. (2018a), ‘Deepening the Explanation of Radical Flank Effects: Tracing Contingent Outcomes of Destructive Capacity’, Qualitative Sociology, 41(1): 111–133.

Ellefsen, R. (2018b), ‘Relational Dynamics of Protest and Protest Policing: Strategic Interaction and the Coevolution of Targeting Strategies’, Policing and Society, 28(7): 751–767.

Ellefsen, R. (2021), ‘The Unintended Consequences of Escalated Repression’, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 26(1): 87–108.

Ellefsen, R., J. Busher (2020), ‘The Dynamics of Restraint in the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty Campaign’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(6): 165–179.

Evans, M. (2004), ‘Extremist Animal Rights Activists Pose Main Threat to Economy’, The Times Online, December 10. Retrieved March 10, 2018 (https://archive.li/IOnVo).

Fallon, K.M., A. Aunio, and J. Kim. (2018). ‘Decoupling International Agreements from Domestic Policy: The State and Soft Repression.’ Human Rights Quarterly, 40(4): 932–61.

Franklin, J. (2015), Persistent Challengers: Repression, Concessions, Challenger Strength, and Commitment in Latin America, Mobilization, 20(1): 61–80.

Ferree, M.M. (2004), ‘Soft Repression: Ridicule, Stigma, and Silencing in Gender-Based Movements’, in D.J. Myers and D.M. Cress (eds.), Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group, pp. 85–101.

Goodwin, J., S. Pfaff (2001), ‘Emotion Work in High-Risk Social Movements: Managing Fear in the US and East German Civil Rights Movements’, in J. Goodwin, J.M. Jasper, and F. Polletta (eds.), Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 282–302.

Groves, J.M. (2001), ‘Animal Rights and the Politics of Emotion: Folk Constructions of Emotion in the Animal Rights Movement’, in J. Goodwin, J.M. Jasper, and F. Polletta (eds.), Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 212–232.

Hochschild, A.R. (2003) [1983], The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling, 2nd ed., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Honari, A. (2017), ‘Responses to Repression’, Sociopedia.isa: 1–15, DOI:10.1177/2005684601751.

Honari, A. (2018), ‘From “the Effect of Repression” toward “the Response to Repression”’, Current Sociology, 66(6): 950–973, DOI:10.1177/0011392118787585.

Jacobsson, K., J. Lindblom (2013), ‘Emotion Work in Animal Rights Activism: A Moral-Sociological Perspective’, Acta Sociologica, 56(1): 55–68.

Jämte, J., R. Ellefsen (2020), ‘The Consequences of Soft Repression’, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 25(3): 383–404.

Jasper, J.M. (1997), The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Jasper, J.M. (1998), ‘The Emotions of Protest: Affective and Reactive Emotions in and around Social Movements’, Sociological Forum, 13(3): 397–424.

Jasper, J.M. (2006), Getting Your Way: Strategic Dilemmas in the Real World, Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

Jasper, J. M. (2007). ‘Cultural Approaches in the Sociology of Social Movements’, in Klandermans B. and Roggeband C. (eds.), Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines. Boston, MA.: Springer, pp. 59–109.

Jasper, J.M. (2011), ‘Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research’, Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1): 285–303.

Jasper, J.M. (2013), ‘Strategy’, in D.A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandermans, and D. McAdam (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, vol. 3, Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, pp. 1262–1266.

Jasper, J.M. and J.W. Duyvendak (eds. 2015), Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Koopmans, R. (1993), ‘The Dynamics of Protest Waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989’, American Sociological Review, 58(5): 637–658.

Koopmans, R. (1997), ‘Dynamics of Repression and Mobilization: The German Extreme Right in the 1990s’, Mobilization: An International Journal, 2(2): 149–164.

Liddick, D.R. (2006), Eco-terrorism: Radical Environmental and Animal Liberation Movements, Westport, CT: Praeger.

Linden, A., B. Klandermans (2006), ‘Stigmatization and Repression of Extreme-Right Activism in the Netherlands’, Mobilization, 11(2): 213–228.

Malthaner, S. (2011), Mobilizing the Faithful: Militant Islamist Groups and Their Constituencies, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

Mann, K. (2007), From Dusk ‘til Dawn: An Insider’s View of the Growth of the Animal Liberation Movement, London: Puppy Pincher Press.

McAdam, D. (1983), ‘Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency’, American Sociological Review, 48(6): 735–754.

McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly (2001), Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Metcalfe, D. (2008), ‘The Protest Game: Animal Rights Protests and the Life Sciences Industry’, Negotiation Journal, 24(2): 125–143.

Meyer, D.S., S. Staggenborg (2008), ‘Opposing Movement Strategies in US Abortion Politics’, in P.G. Coy (ed.), Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, Bingley: Emerald Group, pp. 207–238.

Mills, G. (2012), Assessing the Challenge of Policing Animal Rights Extremism in the UK and the Changing Impact on Community Safety and Human Rights in the Period 2004–2010, Unpublished doctoral thesis, London Metropolitan University.

Mills, G. (2013), ‘The Successes and Failures of Policing Animal Rights Extremism in the UK, 2004–2010’, International Journal of Police Science and Management, 15(1): 30–44.

Moore, K., B. Shepard (2013), ‘Direct Action’, The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Retrieved July 27, 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm431).

Moss, D.M. (2014), ‘Repression, Response, and Contained Escalation Under “Liberalized” Authoritarianism in Jordan’, Mobilization, 19(3): 261–286.

Mulinari, D. (2011), ‘Antirasister’ [Antiracists], in C. Listerborn, I.M. Molina, and D. Mulinar (eds.), Våldets Topografier: Betraktelser Över Makt och Motstånd [Topography of Violence: Reflections on Power and Violence], Stockholm: Atlas.

Opp, K-D. (1994), ‘Repression and Revolutionary Action: East Germany in 1989’, Rationality and Society, 6(1): 101–138.

Pellow, D.N. (2014), Total Liberation: The Power and Promise of Animal Rights and the Radical Earth Movement, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Pierskalla, J.H. (2010), ‘Protest, Deterrence, and Escalation: The Strategic Calculus of Government Repression’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(1), 117–145.

Polletta, F., K. Kretschmer (2015), ‘Movement Factions: Players and Processes’, in J.M. Jasper and J.W. Duyvendak (eds.), Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 35–54.

Santoro, W.A., M. Azab. (2020). 'The Biographical Consequences of Repression: Arab Americans in post-9/11 America,' in H. Johnston, H. and P. Oliver (eds.), Racialized Protest and the State: Resistance and Repression in a Divided America. London: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429292866

Scarce, R. (2006) [1990], Eco-warriors: Understanding the Radical Environmental Movement, 2nd ed., Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

SHAC UK (2006), Newsletter, 44(December). SHAC UK (2007), Newsletter, 46(Summer).

Tarrow, S. (2015). ‘Contentious Politics’, in D. della Porta and M. Diani (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 86–108.

Thörn, H. (1997), Modernitet, Sociologi och Sociala Rörelser [Modernity, Sociology and Social Move-ments], Gothenburg: Department of Sociology, University of Gothenburg.

Tilly, C. (1995), Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tilly, C., S. Tarrow (2007), Contentious Politics, New York: Oxford University Press.

Upton, A. (2011), ‘Contingent Communication in a Hybrid Multi-media World: Analysing the Campaigning Strategies of SHAC’, New Media and Society, 13(1): 96–113.

Upton, A. (2012), ‘“Go On, Get Out There, and Make it Happen”: Reflections on the First Ten Years of Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC)’, Parliamentary Affairs, 65(1): 238–254.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.