Two Variants of the Digital Party: The Platform Party and the Networked Party


This article focuses on the impact of online participation platforms on the internal organization and democracy of a set of emerging political parties such as the Five Star Movement, Podemos, France Insoumise, the Pirate Parties and Barcelona en Comu. Taking cue from the recent publication of Paolo Gerbaudo's book The Digital Party, the article argues that digital parties can be divided in two ideal party types: the platform party and the networked party. Whereas the platform party is highly centralized, led by a charismatic leader, and strictly focused on the electoral competition, the networked party is a more decentralized ideal party type, which allows policy proposals and leadership positions emerge from the network itself. The article concludes by noting that while it would be easy to cast these two variants of the digital party as an alternative between political realism and political idealism, both types of parties face symmetrical challenges such as how to move beyond plebiscitarian consultations and how to scale deliberation from the local level to the national level.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v13i1p896

Keywords: digital party; platform party; networked party; intra-party democracy; digital democracy


Aragón, P., & Gallego, H., & Laniado, D., & Volkovich, Y., & Kaltenbrunner, Andreas. (2017). Online Network Organization of Barcelona en Comú, an Emergent Movement-Party. Computational Social Networks 4. Doi: 10.1186/s40649-017-0044-4.

Barabási, A.-L. (2003). Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. New York, NY: Perseus.

Bardi, L., & Calossi, E., & Pizzimenti E. (2017). What Face Comes First? The Ascendancy of the Party in Public Office. In S. E. Scarrow, P. D. Webb, & T. Poguntke (eds), Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation and Power (pp. 62-83). Oxford: Oxford UP.

Bond, B., & Exley, Z. (2016). Rules for Revolutionaries: How Big Organizing Can Change Everything. Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Political Representation: Elements for a Theory of the Political Field. In P. Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic Power (171-197). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.

Bukart, P. (2014). Pirate Politics: The New Information Policy Contests. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Calise, M. (2007). Il Partito Personale. Roma: Laterza.

Calleja-Lopez, A. (2017). Since 15M: the technopolitical reassembling of democracy in Spain. University of Exeter: PhD dissertation.

Cross, W. P.., & Katz, R. S., & Pruysers (eds). (2018) The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale UP.

Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.

Della Porta, D., Fernández, J., Kouki H. & Mosca, L. (2017). Movement Parties Against Austerity. London: Polity.

Deseriis, M. (2017). Technopopulism: The Emergence of a Discursive Formation. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique 15(2): 441-458.

Deseriis, M. (2019). Digital movement parties: a comparative analysis of the technopolitical cultures and the participation platforms of the Movimento 5 Stelle and the Piratenpartei. Information, Communication & Society. Doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1631375.

Deseriis, M., & Vittori, D. (2019). The impact of online participation platforms on the internal democracy of two Southern European parties: Podemos and the Five-Star Movement. International Journal of Communication 13: 5696-5714.

Gerbaudo, P. (2019) The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy. London: Pluto.

Gerbaudo P. (2018) Il partito piattaforma: La trasformazione dell’organizzazione politica nell’era digitale. Milano: Fondazione Feltrinelli.

Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive Web. New Media & Society 15(8): 1348–1365.

Helmond, A. (2015). The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready. Social Media + Society 1(2): 1-11. Doi: 10.1177/2056305115603080.

Karpf, D. (2018). Analytic activism and its limitations. Social Media + Society 4(1): 1–10. Doi:10.1177/2056305117750718.

Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1993). The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization. American Review of Politics 14(4): 593–618.

Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (eds.) (1994). How Parties Organize. Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.

Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics 1(1): 5-28.

Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (2009). The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement. Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 753-766.

Kitschelt, H. (2006). Movement Parties. In Katz, R. & Crotty, W. (eds). Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 280-290). London: Sage.

Margetts, H. (2006). Margetts, H. (2006). Cyber parties. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 528–535). London, UK: SAGE Publications.

Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). “Mediatization” of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? Political Communication 16(3): 247-261.

McKelvey, F. (2011). A programmable platform? Drupal, modularity, and the future of the web. Fibreculture 18.


Michels, R. (1915). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Hearst’s International Library Company.

Mosca, L. (2018). Democratic vision and online participatory spaces in the Italian Movimento 5 Stelle. Acta Politica. Doi:10.1057/s41269-018-0096-y.

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software.

Panebianco, A. (1992). Modelli di partito. Organizzazione e potere nei partiti politici. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Poguntke T. (1993). Alternative Politics: The German Green Party. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.

Russo Spena, G. and Forti. (2016). S. Ada Colau. La città in commune. Roma: Alegre.

Scarrow, S. (2000). Parties without Members? Party Organization in a Changing Electoral Environment. In R. Dalton & M. Wattenberg (eds), Parties without Partisans, (pp. 79-101). Oxford: Oxford UP.

Shea Baird, K. (2015). Beyond Ada Colau: the common people of Barcelona en Comú. OpenDemocracy. 27 May.

Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York, NY: Penguin.

Toret, J. (2015). Tecnopolítica y 15M: la potencia de las multitudes conectadas: un estudio sobre la gestación y explosión del 15M. Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.

Van Biezen, I., & Mair, P. and Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, going, . . . gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 24-56.

Weber, M. (1946). Politics as Vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 77-¬128). New York: Oxford UP, 1946.

Zelinka, A. (2018). Examining Barcelona en Comú’s attempt to be a movement-party. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.

Il Blog delle Stelle. (2019). La verità sul voto su Rousseau. 31 August. Le 10 fake news a cui non credere [The truth about the vote on Rousseau. Ten fake news that are not to be believed].

Participa Podemos. (2020). Participation portal official member count as of 21 February 2020.

France 2. (2017). Partis politiques: les vrais chiffres des adhérents [Political parties: the true numbers about members]. 17 November.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.