Party and Protest Political Participation among Students in Western and Central-Eastern Europe


Abstract


This paper aims to bridge the literature on students' socio-political attitudes with the wider literature on political participation that previously focused on cross-regional differences in participation rates and on varied forms of participation more generally. In doing so, the paper extends the empirical scope of previous analyses by exploring, on the one hand, the extent to which student political participation varies across wide ranges of both party- and protest-related activities; and, on the other hand, by looking at differences in student and non-student participation across 6 countries – 4 old democracies in Western European (WE) and 2 post-communist democracies in Central-Eastern Europe (CEE). Methodologically, the paper combines a quasi-experimental design based on genetic matching with regression models in order to better isolate the effect of student status on political participation from that of age, gender, and family background. Using original survey data gathered within the framework of the POLPART Project among 6,990 respondents, the results for both WE and CEE suggest that students do not significantly differ from non-students in terms of political participation when they are matched on age, gender, and family background. Additionally, when controlling for other variables commonly associated with political participation, such as political interest, students actually appear to engage in party politics less than their non-student counterparts. This indicates that existing college-effects models focusing on the impact of being a student on socio-political attitudes are, at best, spurious. When matching and formally comparing stu-dents in WE and in CEE, CEE students appear to be more engaged than their WE counterparts. This indicates that the "apathetic" and "atomistic" perspective on CEE political engagement might not hold for more recent years, especially when it comes to Romania.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v12i1p71

Keywords: party participation; protest participation; student participation; youth participation; genetic matching

References


Andreescu, L., and Proteasa, V. (2019). Students, their protests, and their organizations: exploring old and new dilemmas. PArtecipazione e COnflitto [PArticipation and COn-flict], (1).

Bernhagen, P., and M. Marsh (2007), “Voting and Protesting: Explaining Citizen Participa-tion in Old and New European Democracies.” Democratization, 14(1): 44-72.

Bernhard, M., and E. Karakoc (2011), “Civil Society and the Legacies of Dictatorship.” World Politics. 59(4): 539-567.

Braun, D., and S. Hutter (2014), “Political Trust, Extra-representational Participation and the Openness of Political Systems.” International Political Science Review. 37(2): 151-165.

Braun, D. (2012), “Trends in Political Trust in New European Democracies: Decline or In-crease? – Implications for Established Democracies.” Innovative Democracy Working Paper Series, 1(2). Available at:

https://fedora.phaidra.univie.ac.at/fedora/get/o:107234/bdef:Content/get.

Burean, T., and G. Badescu (2014), “Voices of discontent: Student protest participation in Romania.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47(3–4), 385–397.

Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality and political participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (1960), The American voter. Oxford, England: John Wiley.

Campbell, C. and J. Horowitz (2016), “Does College Influence Sociopolitical Attitudes?.” Sociology of Education 89(1): 40-58

Catterberg, G., and A. Moreno (2006), “The Individual Base of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 18(1): 32-48.

Converse, P. E. (1988), “Perspectives on the democratic process.” Michigan Quarterly Review, 27, 285-299.

Cuong, N. V. (2012), “Which covariates should be controlled in propensity score match-ing? Evidence from a simulation study.” Statistica Neerlandica. 67(2): 169-180.

Dalton, R.J., A. van Sickle, and S. Weldon (2009), “The Individual-Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Sociology 40: 51-73.

Dalton, R.J. and M.P. Wattenberg (2000), Parties without partisans. Oxford: Oxford Un. Press.

Dey, E. (1997), “Undergraduate Political Attitudes: Peer Influence in

Changing Social Con-texts”. The Journal of Higher Education. 68(4), 398-413

Dodson, K. (2011), “The Movement Society in Comparative Perspective.” Mobilization 16: 475-494.

Esser, F., and C.H. de Vreese(2007), “Comparing young voters’ political engagement in the United States and Europe.” American behavioral scientist, 50 (9), 11951213.

Franklin, M. (2004), Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in estab-lished democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heckman, J., H. Ichimura, and P. Todd. (1997), “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme,” Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605–654.

Henn M., Weinstein M., and S. Forrest (2005), “Uninterested youth? Young people’s atti-tudes towards party politics in Britain.” Political Studies, 53(3): 556–578.

Ho, D., K. Imai, G. King, and E. Stuart (2011), “MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference.” Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8): 1-28.

Hooghe, M., and S. Marien (2013), “A Comparative Analysis of the Political Trust and Forms of Political Participation in Europe.” European Societies, 15(1), 131-152.

Hooghe, M., and E. Quintelier (2014), “Political Participation in European Countries: The Effect of Authoritarian Rule, Corruption, Lack of Good Governance and Economic Downturn.” Comparative European Politics, 12(2), 209-232.

Hout, M. (2012.) “Social and Economic Returns to College Education in the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology 38(1):379-400.

Howard, M. (2002), “The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe.” Journal of Democracy, 13(1): 157-169.

Howard, M. (2003), The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hustinx, L., L. Meijs, F. Handy, and R. Cnaan (2012), “Monitorial Citizens or Civic Omni-vores? Repertoires of Civic Participation among University Students.” Youth and Socie-ty 44 (1), 95–117.

Kingston, P. W., R. Hubbard, B. Lapp, P. Schroeder, and J. Wilson (2003), “Why Education Matters.’’ Sociology of Education 76(1):53-70.

Klandermans, B. (2013), How do citizens try to Influence Politics and Why. ERC Research Proposal.

Letki, N. (2003), Explaining Political Participation in East-central

Europe: Social Capital, Democracy and the Communist Past. Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.

Loader, B. D. (2007), Young citizens in the digital age: Political engagement, young people and new media. London: Routledge.

Loevinger, J. (1948), “The technique of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of ‘scale analysis’ and factor analysis.” Psychological Bulletin, 45, 507-530.

Mokken, R. J. (1971), A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis. Berlin, Germany: De Gruy-ter.

Morales, L. (2009), Joining Political Organizations. Institutions, Mobilisation and participa-tion in Western Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.

Newton, K., and J.R. Montero (2007), “Patterns of Political and Social Participation in Eu-rope.” In Jowell, Roger, Caroline Roberts, Rory Fitzgerald and Gillian Eva (eds). Meas-uring Attitudes Cross-Nationally, London: SAGE Publications, pp. 204-237.

Oana, I.E. (2019), “Reinvigorating Romania’s Civil Society: Talking About Politics and Cor-ruption in Romania.”, In When Citizens Talk About Politics, edited by Clare Saunders and Bert Klandermans. Routledge.

Olcese, C., C. Saunders, and N. Tzavidis (2014), “In the streets with a degree: How politi-cal generations, educational attainment and student status affect engagement in pro-test politics.” International Sociology, 29(6), 525–545.

Olteanu, Tina, and Shaazka Beyerle (2017) The Romanian People versus Corruption: The Paradoxical Nexus of Protest and Adaptation. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 10(3): 795–825.

Sijtsma, K. and I. W. Molenaar (1987). “Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory.” Psychometrika, 52, 79-97.

Stuart E. A. (2010), “Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look for-ward.” Statistical science: a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 25(1), 1-21.

Teorell, J., M. Torcal, and J. R. Montero (2007), “Political Participation. Mapping the Ter-rain.” In Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analy-sis, edited by J. van Deth, J. R. Montero, and A. Westholm, 334-357. London, Routledge.

Trow, M. (1999), “From Mass Higher Education to Universal Access: The American Ad-vantage.” Minerva, 37: 303-328.

Quaranta, M. (2013), “Measuring political protest in Western Europe: Assessing cross-national equivalence.” European Political Science Review, 5(3), 457-482

Van Schuur, W. (2003), “Mokken Scale Analysis: Between the Guttman Scale and Para-metric Item Response Theory.” Political Analysis, 11(2), 139-163.

Verba, S., Nie, N. H, and Kim, J. (1978), Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K., and H. E. Brady (1995), Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K., and N. Burns (2005), “Family ties: Understanding the Intergen-erational transmission of political participation.” In The Social Logic of Politics: Person-al Networks as Context for Political Behaviour, edited by Zuckerman, Alan. Temple Uni-versity Press, pp. 95-114.

Wolfinger, R. E., and S. J. Rosenstone (1980), Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.

Závecz, G. (2017), “Post-Communist Societies of Central and Eastern Europe.” In Hand-book on Political Trust, edited by Zmerli, Sonja, and

van der Meer, Tom. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 440-460.

Zsolt, E., and G. Zavecz (2019), “In the Land of Inefficacy: Talking About Hungarian Ap-proaches to Participation.” In When Citizens Talk About Politics, edited by Clare Saun-ders and Bert Klandermans. Routledge.

Zukin, C., and S. Keeter (2006), A new engagement: political participation, civic life and the changing American citizens. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.