Impolitic Gambling. Chance and Inequality in Contemporary Italy


Abstract


The liberalization of gambling is a measure equally taken and implemented by both sides with-in the bipolar system that typified Italian politics over the years 1990-2000. For 25 years, the growing number of operators, players and betting opportunities has been blessed as a "necessity", a forced deci-sion that does not respect the reference values represented by the political forces that have in turn been part of the ruling majorities. The assumption of this paper is that the financial and regulatory consolidation path of the "lawful game" provides, both from the governmental and cultural viewpoint, a privileged indi-cation to describe the depoliticization of the Second Italian Republic compared to the conflict that should have raged within it as a competitive democracy. From the government viewpoint, the elected institutions renounced the political direction of the field to support the neo-liberal axioms that consider the accuracy of public accounting, the encouragement of consumption and the transfer of public assets to private capitals as three indisputable methods to pursue economic growth. From a cultural viewpoint, the silent consensus of Italian voters for gambling seems to reflect a more general consensus for the "chance" factor, the tolerance for uncertainty that deeply per-meates Italy as the other neo-capitalist societies.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v10i2p569

Keywords: Gambling; Depoliticization; Risk; Chance factor; Second Italian Republic

References


AA. VV (2017), Sintesi della normativa e della giurisprudenza in materia di gioco d’azzardo e ludopatia. Avviso Pubblico. Revised March 27, 2017. Retrieved April 15, 2017 (http://www.avvisopubblico.it/home/documentazione/gioco-dazzardo/sintesi-della-normativa-in-materia-di-gioco-dazzardo-e-ludopatia/)

Bauman Z. (1996), “From Pilgrim to Tourist – or a short History of Identity” in Hall S., du Gay P. (eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity, London: Sage

Bauman Z. (2000), Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press

Beck U. (1996), “Risk Society Revisited: theory, politics and research programmes” in

Adam B., van Loon J. (eds.), The Risk Society and Beyond, London: Sage, pp. 211–229

Beckert J., Lutter M. (2008), “The Inequality of Fair Play. Lottery Gambling and Social Stratification in Germany”, European Sociological Review, 25 (4): 475-488

Berger P., Luckmann T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality, London: Penguin Books

Cosgrave J. F. (ed. 2006), The Sociology of Risk and Gambling Reader, New York: Routledge

Custodero A. (2013), Stop ai nuovi videopoker. Caos al Senato. Revised September 6, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2017

(http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2013/09/06/stop-ai-nuovi-videopoker-caos-al-senato.html?ref=search)

Dotti M., Esposito M. (eds. 2016), Ludocrazia. Un lessico dell’azzardo di massa, Milano: ObarraO

Fiasco M. (2016), “Sistemi di regolazione del gioco d’azzardo in Italia”, in Dotti M., Espo-sito M. (eds.), Ludocrazia. Un lessico dell’azzardo di massa, Milano: ObarraO, pp. 261-273

Galbiati W. (2013), L'Imu salva i re delle Slot machine. Un condono per tutti gli operatori. Revised September 20, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2017

(http://www.repubblica.it/economia/2013/09/02/news/l_imu_salva_i_re_delle_slot_machine_un_condono_per_tutti_gli_operatori-65752382/)

Gallino L. (2011), Finanzcapitalismo. La civiltà del denaro in crisi, Torino: Einaudi

Harvey D. (1990), The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell

Iori M. (2013), Politica e gioco d’azzardo: poche luci e molte ombre. Research report. Re-vised February 11, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2017

(http://www.mettiamociingioco.org/download/11022013_IORI.pdf)

Jessop B. (2002), “Globalization and the National State”, in S. Aaronowitz and P. Bratsis, (eds.), Paradigm Lost: State Theory Reconsidered, Minneapolis: University of Minneso-ta Press, pp. 185-220

Jessop B. (2009), “The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Globalizing Capital and Their Impact on State Power and Democracy”, in Rosa H., Scheuerman W.E. (eds.), High-Speed So-ciety, University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press, pp. 135-158

La Repubblica (1992), Respirano i conti pubblici. Revised December 11, 1993. Retrieved April 15, 2017

(2017http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/1992/12/11/respirano-conti-pubblici.html?ref=search)

La Repubblica (1993), Fisco ricco con i giochi. Revised august 20, 1993. Retrieved April 15, 2017

(http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/1993/08/20/fisco-ricco-con-giochi.html?ref=search)

La Repubblica (2002a), Decreto omnibus e videopoker, il governo ritira l'emendamento. Repubblica.it. Revised July 18, 2002. Retrieved April 15, 2017

(http://www.repubblica.it/online/economia/omnibus/omnibus/omnibus.html?ref=search)

La Repubblica (2002b), Il Fisco deve avere un’etica. Revised July 19, 2002. Retrieved April 15, 2017

(http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2002/07/19/il-fisco-deve-avere-un-etica.html?ref=search)

Leclerc-Olive M. (2005), Délibération et décision: l’espace public disqualifié par le calcul économique. Une approche critique de la théorie probabiliste classique. Revised No-vember 2005. Retrieved April 15, 2017 (fr.pekea-fr.org/Rennes/T-Leclerc-Olive.doc)

Lo Verde F. (2013), “Alimentare sogni, destrutturare speranze. Politiche di offerta e di-namica della domanda di gioco aleatorio nell’Italia contemporanea”, Sociologia del Lavoro, 132: 79-96

Lyng S. (ed. 2005), Edgework: The Sociology of Risk-Taking. New York: Routledge

Macry P. (1997), Giocare la vita. Storia del lotto a Napoli tra Sette e Ottocento, Roma: Donzelli

Magatti M. (2008), Libertà immaginaria. Le illusioni del capitalismo tecno-nichilista, Fel-trinelli: Milano

Marquard O. (1986), Apologie des Zufälligen: philosophische Studien, Leipzig: Reclam

Nibert D. (2006) [2000], “State Lotteries and the Legitimation of Inequality” in Cosgrave J. F. (ed.), The Sociology of Risk and Gambling Reader, New York: Routledge, pp. 319-338

Pedroni M. (2014), “The «banker» state and the «responsible» enterprises. Capital con-version strategies in the field of public legal gambling”, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 1: 71-98

Poulantzas N. (1978), State, Power, Socialism, London: Verso.

Povoledo E. (2013), Fears of Social Breakdown as Gambling Explodes in Italy. Revised De-cember 28, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2017

(http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/world/europe/fears-of-social-breakdown-as-gambling-explodes-in-italy.html)

Prigogine I., Stengers I. (1997) [1996], End of Certainty, London: Free Press

Rawls J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Ma: Belknap

Reith G. (1999), The Age of Chance: Gambling in Western Culture, London/New York: Routledge

Sarti S., Triventi M. (2012), “Il gioco d'azzardo: l'iniquità di una tassa volontaria. La rela-zione tra posizione socio-economica e propensione al gioco”, Stato e Mercato, 3: 503-534

Scheuerman W. E. (2000), “The Economic State of Emergency”, Cardozo Law Review, 21: 1869-1890

Schüll N. D. (2014), Addiction by Design. Machine Gambling in Las Vegas, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Segatori A. (2016), “Libertà” in Dotti M., Esposito M. (eds.), Ludocrazia. Un lessico dell’azzardo di massa, Milano: ObarraO, pp. 173-177

Sennett R. (2006), The Culture of the New Capitalism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Taleb N. (2007), The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, New York: The Random House

Tizian G., Tonacci F. (eds. 2013), “Criminal Jackpot”, La Repubblica – L’Espresso. Revised February 21, 2013. Retrivied April 15, 2017

(http://inchieste.repubblica.it/it/repubblica/rep-it/inchiesta-italiana/2013/02/21/news/criminal_jack_pot-52122747/)


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.