Restructuring Public Action in Rome. Neoliberalization and the Relationships between Public and Private Actors


Abstract


The paper explores the changes in public action that have occurred over the last twenty years in the city of Rome, focusing on two case studies which represent an example of policy restructuring and depict the new role attributed to private initiative and investments, to the detriment of public roles and public property. The paper debates the interpretive utility of the concept of neoliberalization for under?standing these processes of change. The first case study regards the privatization of a public utility in charge with providing water and energy; the second one focuses on the valorization of a public real?estate property. Both cases highlight processes of marketization and commodification, depicting a neoliberal mode of public action, widely regarded as the obvious response to the inefficiencies of more traditional administrative action. The theoretical con?ceptualization of neoliberalization allows one to approach these changes as part of a more organized and coherent framework, and as important moments in the neoliberalization process in Rome. The contextual?ly specific and path?dependent form of this process can be better understood by looking at the strong alli?ance between political and private actors, in particular, those who are linked to real estate and land prop?erties. This strategic relationship, in existence since the end of the 19th century, keeps on shaping public action and influencing political decisions

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v9i2p596

Keywords: neoliberalization; urban policy; public services; urban planning; valorization of public proper‐ties; public and private relationships

References


Assini N., Mantini P. (2007), Manuale di diritto urbanistico, Milano: Giuffrè Editore.

Berdini P. (2008), “Roma tra pianificazione e contrattazione”, Contesti, Città, Territori, Progetti, 2:79-88.

Bobbio L. (2000), “Produzione di politiche a mezzo di contratti nella pubblica amministrazione italiana”, Stato e mercato, 58: 111-142.

Brenner N. (1999), “Globalisation as Reterritorialisation: The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union”, Urban Studies, 36 (3): 431-451.

Brenner N. and Theodore N. (2002), “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism’”, Antipode, 34(3): 349-379.

Brenner N., Peck J. and Theodore N. (2010), “After neoliberalization”, Globalizations, 7 (3): 327–345.

Corte dei Conti (2010), Obiettivi e risultati delle operazioni di privatizzazione di partecipazioni pubbliche, delibera n. 3/2010/G.

d’Albergo E., Moini G. (2015), Il regime dell’Urbe. Politica, economia e potere a Roma, Roma: Carocci editore.

De Vergottini G. (2009), “Liberalizzazione dei servizi nell’Unione Europea”, Norme e idee, Roma: Istituto della enciclopedia italiana Treccani: 331-338.

Erbani F. (2013), Roma. Il tramonto della città pubblica, Bari: Editori Laterza.

European Commission (2003), Commission Green Paper of 21 May 2003 on services of general interest, [COM(2003) 270 final -Official Journal C 76 of 25.03.2004].

Fainstein S. (2014), “The resilience of neoliberalism and its urban effects”, Critical Policy Studies, 8 (3): 356-358.

Harvey D. (1989), “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism”, Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71 (1): 3-17.

Harvey D. (2006), “Neo-liberalism as creative destruction”, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88 (2): 145-158.

Iacovino R. (2014), Processi di neoliberalizzazione e strategie neoliberiste in ambito urbano: le relazioni tra politica e mercato a Roma, Roma: Pubblicazioni Aperte Digitali della Sapienza (http://padis.uniroma1.it).

Insolera I. (2011) [1962], Roma Moderna. Da Napoleone I al XXI secolo, Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore Spa.

Jessop B. (1997), “The Entrepreneurial City: Re-imaging localities, redesigning economic governance or restructuring capital”, in Jewson N. and MacGregor S. (eds), Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Divisions, London: Routledge, pp. 28-41.

Keating M. (2001), “Public Management Reform and Economic and Social Development”, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1 (2): 141-212.

Kleniewski N., Thomas A. R. (2010), Cities, Change and Conflict: a Political Economy of Urban Life, Boston: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Kotz D. M. (2002), “Globalization and Neoliberalism”, Rethinking Marxism, 12 (2): 64-79.

Krätke S. (2014), “Cities in Contemporary Capitalism”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38 (5): 1660-1677.

Marcelloni M. (2003), Pensare la città contemporanea. Il nuovo Piano Regolatore di Roma, Bari: Editori Laterza.

Municipality of Rome (2006), Resolution No. 118 ‘Approvazione schema di assetto con valore programmatico relative all’ambito di valorizzazione Città Storica Delle Province-Lega-Lombarda’.

Municipality of Rome (2008), Piano Regolatore Generale. Norme Tecniche di Attuazione.

Nessi H., Delpirou A. (2009), “La compensazione urbanistica a Roma”, Democrazia e diritto, 1: 83-88.

Nestor S., Mahboobi L. (2000), Privatization of Public Utilities, Paris: OECD.

OECD (2007), “Competitive Cities, A New Entrepreneurial Paradigm in Spatial Development”, OECD Territorial Review.

Ong, A. (2007), “Neoliberalism as a mobile technology”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1): 3–8.

Pagnotta G. (2009), Roma industriale. Tra dopoguerra e miracolo economico, Roma: Editori Riuniti University Press.

Peck J. (2014), “Entrepreneurial urbanism: between uncommon sense and dull compulsion”, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96 (4): 396–401.

Peck J, Theodore N. and Brenner N. (2009), “Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations”, SAIS Review, XXIX (1): 49-66.

Peck J. (2008), “Remaking Laissez-faire”, Progress in Human Geography, 32 (1): 3-43.

Peck J., Tickell A. (2002), “Neoliberalizing Space”, Antipode, 34 (3): 380-404.

Pizzo B. (2015), “Fuoco incrociato sul planning”, in Moini G. (ed.), Neoliberismi e azione pubblica. Il caso italiano, Roma: Ediesse.

Pizzo B., Di Salvo G. (2015), “Il nodo della rendita immobiliare”, in d’Albergo E. and Moini G. (eds), Il regime dell’Urbe. Politica, economia e potere a Roma, Roma: Carocci editore, pp. 82-97.

Purcell M. (2008), Recapturing democracy: neoliberalization and the struggle for alternative urban futures, New York: Routledge.

Rossi U., Vanolo A. (2010), Geografia politica urbana, Bari: Editori Laterza.

Sassen S. (2001), The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sassen S. (2007), A Sociology of Globalisation, New York: W.W. Norton & Company Ltd.

Schmidt V., Thatcher M. (2014), “Why are neoliberal ideas so resilient in Europe’s political economy?”, Critical Policy Studies, 8 (3): 340-347.

Springer S. (2010), “Neoliberalism and Geography: Expansions, Variegations, Formations”, Geography Compass, 4 (8): 1025–1038.

Springer S. (2014), “Neoliberalism in denial”, Dialogues in Human Geography, 4(2): 154-160.

Stone C. N. (1989), Regime politics. Governing Atlanta 1946-1988, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

Stone C. N. (2006), “Power, reform and urban regime analysis”, City & Community, 5 (1): 23-38.

Taylor P.J., Csomós G. (2012), “Cities as control and command centres: Analysis and interpretation”, Cities, 29 (6): 408-411.

Theodore N., Peck J. (2011), “Framing neoliberal urbanism: Translating ‘commonsense’ urban policy across the OECD zone”, European Urban and Regional Studies, 19 (1): 20-41.

Urbani P. (2000), Urbanistica consensuale. La disciplina degli usi del territorio tra liberalizzazione, programmazione negoziata e tutele differenziate, Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

Vicari Haddock S. (2004), La città contemporanea, Bologna: Il Mulino.

Vidotto V. (2001), Roma contemporanea, Bari: Editori Laterza.

Zangani M. (1995), “L’evoluzione della normativa nel settore della finanza locale”, Bollettino di informazioni costituzionali e parlamentari, 1-3: 211-223.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.