Political Sociology as a Connective Social Science: Between Old Topics and New Directions


Abstract


Our aim is to identify the characters of a real political sociology as a «connective social science» that studies political phenomena by creating fruitful connections with other perspectives. Modern politics may be defined as the set of activities designed to regulate human coexistence in a given social context through a prearranged establishment of a certain order. Such an order can only be guaranteed if a social group is able to acquire the power guaranteed by the exclusive use of force. From this point of view, modern politics, to be explained, must be observed in its complexity. Reasoning on the relationship between social and political structures (and between sociology and political science) is not enough. Political analysts should also pay attention to other dimensions, aware that politics is not made only of social and political-institutional relations. It is also made ​​of individuals, cultures, economic arrangements, territories. For this reason, political sociologists should also consider the typical explanatory variables of psychology, anthropology, economics and geography. The classic topics of political sociology are well known. It is a discipline that, through different approaches, has historically focused on the forms and relations of power wi­thin the territorial dimension of the nation state. The trans-nationalization of social processes, the frequent financial and economic crises, the explosion of new war zones, the crisis of classical political actors ha­ve led to new studies on the relationship between society and politics in a global society, redefining the boundaries of political sociology. The issues are always the same, but the lens through which they are investigated is different. global financial crisis, Ettore Recchi and Justyna Salamońska on the important topic of the European identity in the context of the Euro-Crisis, Juan Dìez Medrano on the individual and collective responses to crisis by providing an analytical framework for the study of social resilience, Klaus Eder on the so-called paradox of political participation that can equally produce civil and uncivil outcomes. The issue will be concluded with my article on the logical structures of comparison in social and political research.

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v7i3p414

Keywords: Political sociology; Modern politics; Political Power; Political Science; Political Psychology; Political Anthropology; Political Economy; Political geography

References


Almond G.A., J.S. Coleman (1960, ed.), The Politics of the Developing Areas, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Aristotle (1981), The Politics, London: Penguin Books, (translated by T.A. Sinclair, re-vised and represented by T.J. Saunders).

Balandier G. (1967), Anthropologie politique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; tr.eng., Political Anthropology, Baltimore: Penguin Books.

Bendix R. and S.M. Lipset (1957), “Political Sociology: An Essay and Bibliography”, Cur-rent Sociology, 6(2): 79-169, doi: 10.1177/001139215700600201.

Bendix R., S.M. Lipset (1966), “The Field of Political Sociology”, in Coser L.A. (ed.), Political Sociology, New York: Harper & Row, pp. 9-47.

Berger S. (1981), Organized Interests in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

Biorcio R. (1991), “La Lega come attore politico: dal federalismo

al populismo regionali-sta” in Mannheimer R. (ed.), La Lega Lombarda, Milano: Feltrinelli, pp. 34-82.

Bobbio N. (1990a), “Politica”, in Bobbio N., N. Matteucci, G.

Pasquino (ed.), Dizionario di politica, Torino: TEA, pp. 800-809.

Bobbio N. (1990b), “Scienza politica”, in Bobbio N., N. Matteucci, G. Pasquino (ed.), Dizionario di politica, Torino: TEA, pp. 996-1002.

Bruno I., E. Didier, and T. Vitale (2014), “Statactivism: Forms of action between disclo-sure and affirmation”, Partecipazione e conflitto, 7(2): 198-220, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i2p198.

Cameron D.R. (1985), “Does Government Cause Inflation? Taxes, Spending and Defi-cits”, in Lindberg L.N., C.S. Maier (ed.), The Politics of Inflation and Global Stagna-tion, Washington: The Brookings Institution, pp. 181-209.

Campbell A., P.E. Converse, W.E. Miller, D.E. Stokes (1960), The American Voter, New York: Wiley.

Catellani P. (1997), Psicologia politica, Bologna: Il Mulino.

Catellani P., G. Sensales (2011, ed.), Psicologia politica, Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

Cohen R. (1969), “Anthropology and Political Science”, in Lipset S.M. (ed.), Politics and the Social Sciences, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 29-48.

Coser L.A. (1966), “Introduction”, in Coser L.A. (ed.), Political Sociology, New York, Harper & Row, pp. 1-8.

Cox K.R. (2002), Political Geography: Territory, State, and Society, Malden: Blackwell.

de Nardis F. (2013), Sociologia politica. Per comprendere i fenomeni politici contemporanei, Milano: McGraw-Hill.

Diamanti I. (1996), Il male del Nord. Lega, localismo, secessione, Roma: Donzelli.

Diamanti I. (2009), Mappe dell’Italia politica. Bianco, rosso, verde, azzurro … e tricolore, Bologna: Il Mulino.

Duchesne S., E. Frazer, F. Haegel, and V. Van Ingelgom (2013, ed.), Citizens’ Reactions to European Integration Compared: Overlooking Europe, Basingstoke, Palgrave Mac¬millian.

Duverger M. (1967), Sociologie de la politique. Eléments de Science Politique, Paris: Presses Universitaires, II. Edition.

Dyson K. (1983), “The Cultural, Ideological and Structural Context”, in Dyson K., S. Willks (ed.), Industrial Crisis, London:

Basic Blackwell, pp. 26-66.

Elliot J.E. (1978), “Institutionalism as an Approach to Political Economy”, Journal of Economic Issue, 1: 91-114.

Ferrera M. (1989), “«Political economy» e scienza politica: un primo bilancio”, in Pane-bianco A. (ed.), L’analisi della politica, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 451-468.

Freund J (1965), L’essence du politique, Paris: Sirey.

Gallino L. (1989), “Politica, sociologia della”, in Id., Sociologia della politica, Torino: Utet, pp. 165-172.

Giorgi A., E. Polizzi (2014), “Paths of Research in Religion and Politics: An Introduction”, Partecipazione e conflitto, 7(1): 1-13, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i1p01.

Gourevitch P. (1986), Politics in Hard Times, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Greenstein F.I. (1969), “Personality and Politics: Problems of Evidence, Inference, and Conceptualization”, in Lipset S.M. (ed.), Politics and the Social Sciences, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 163-206.

Hermann M. (1986, ed.), Political Psychology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hobbes T. (1982) [1650], Leviathan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hobbes T. (1994), Human Nature and De Corpore Politico, New York: Oxford University Press.

Larrue J. (1994), “La psychologie politique dans le monde francophone”, Connexions, 64: 31-54.

Lasswell H.D. (1930), Psychopathology and Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lasswell H.D. (1948), Power and Personality, New York: Norton.

Lippman W. (1922), Public Opinion, New York: Hartcourt, Brace.

Lipset S.M. (1959), “Political Sociology”, in Merton R. (ed.), Sociology Today, New York: Basic Books, pp. 81-114.

Lipset S.M. (1960), Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, London: Heinemann.

Lipset S.M. (1969), “Politics and the Social Sciences: Introduction”, in Lipset S.M. (ed.), Politics and the Social Sciences, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. vii-xxii.

Lipset S.M., S. Rokkan (1967), “Cleavages Structures, Party Systems and Voter Align-ment: An Introduction”, in Lipset S.M., S. Rokkan (ed.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments, New York: The Free Press, pp. 1-64.

Lowie R. (1927), The Origin of the State, New York: Russell & Russell.

Mitchell W.C. (1969), “The Shape of Political Theory to Come: From Political Sociology to Political Economy”, in Lipset S.M. (ed.), Politics and the Social Sciences, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 101-136.

Pappalardo A. (1989), “L’analisi economica della politica”, in Panebianco A. (ed.), L’analisi della politica, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 193-216.

Pennati E. (1961), Elementi di sociologia politica, Torino: Edizioni di Comunità.

Poggi G. (2001), Forms of Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Pye L. (1964), “Democracy, Modernization, and Nation Building”, in Pennock J.R. (ed.), Self-Government in Modernizing Nations, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, pp. 6-25.

Runciman W.C. (1963), Social Sciences and Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Russell B. (1938), Power, London: Allen & Unwin.

Sartori G. (1969), “From the Sociology of Politics to Political Sociology”, in Lipset S.M. (ed.), Politics and the Social Sciences, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 65-100.

Schmidt M. (1983), “Stato ed economia in tempo di crisi: ventitré democrazie industriali a confronto”, Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 1: 103-137.

Schmitt C. (1927), Der Begriffdes Politischen, in Archivfür Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik 58/1927.

Schmitter P., G. Lehmburch (1979, ed.), Trends towards Corporatist Intermediation, London: Sage.

Smelser N.J. (1967), “Sociology and the Other Social Sciences”, in Lazarsfeld P.F. et al. (ed.), The Uses of Sociology, New York: Basic Books, pp.3-44.

Smith M.G. (1956), “On Segmentary Lineage Systems”, Royal Anthropological Institute, 86(2), London.

Tajfel H. (1981), Human Groups and Social Categories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor G. (2010), The New Political Sociology: Power, Ideology and Identity in an Age of Complexity, New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

Tilly Ch. (1975, ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Tilly Ch. (2007), Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weber M. (1978) [1922], Economics and Society, 2 vol., Berkeley: University of Califor-nia Press.

Weber M. (2004) [1919], The Vocation Lectures: Science as a Vocation. Politics as a Vocation, Indiana, Indianapolis: Hacket Publishing Company.

White L.A. (1959), The Evolution of Culture, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Wilensky H.L. (1981), “Leftism, Catholicism and Democratic Corporatism: The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development”, in Flora P, A.J. Heidenheimer (ed.), The Development of Welfare State in Europe and America, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, pp. 345-382.

Papers published in this Special Issue:

de Nardis F. (2014), “The Logical Structures of Comparison: Its Forms, Styles, Problems, and the Role of History in Social and Political Research”, Partecipazione e conflitto, 7(3): 576-615, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i3p576.

Della Porta D. (2014), “Cycles of Protest and the Consolidation of Democracy”, Partecipazione e conflitto, 7(3): 447-468, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i3p447.

Eder K. (2014), “The Paradox of Political Participation: Theorizing Uncivil Society”, Partecipazione e conflitto, 7(3): 551-575, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i3p551.

Medrano J.D. (2014), “Individual and Collective Responses to Crisis: An Analytical Framework for the Study of Social Resilience”, Partecipazione e conflitto, 7(3): 532-550, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i3p532.

Recchi E., J. Salamońska (2014), “The Final Countdown? European Identity and the Euro-Crisis”, Partecipazione e conflitto, 7(3): 509-531, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i3p509.

Ruzza C. (2014), “The Ideology of New Public Management, Associational Representation and the Global Financial Crisis”, Partecipazione e conflitto, 7(3): 490-508, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i3p490.

Trenz H-J, A. Michailidou (2014), “European Integration, Democracy and Crisis: A Mass Media Perspective”, Partecipazione e conflitto, 7(3): 469-489, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i3p469.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
کاغذ a4
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.