Statactivism: Forms of action between disclosure and affirmation


Abstract


This article introduces the special issue on statactivism, a particular form of action within the repertoire used by contemporary social movements: the mobilization of statistics. Traditionally, statistics has been used by the worker movement within the class conflicts. But in the current configuration of state restructuring, new accumulation regimes, and changes in work organization in capitalists societies, the activist use of statistics is moving. This first article seeks to show the use of statistics and quantification in contentious performances connected with state restructuring, main transformations of the varieties of capitalisms, and changes in work organization regimes. The double role of statistics in representing as well as criticizing reality is considered. After showing how important statistical tools are in producing a shared reading of reality, we will discuss the two main dimensions of statactivism – disclosure and affirmation. In other words, we will see the role of stat-activists in denouncing a certain state of reality, and then the efforts to use statistics in creating equivalency among disparate conditions and in cementing emerging social categories. Finally, we present the main contributions of the various research papers in this special issue regarding the use of statistics as a form of action within a larger repertoire of contentious action. Six empirical papers focus on statactivism against the penal machinery in the early 1970s (Grégory Salle), on the mobilisation on the price index in Guadalupe in 2009 (Boris Samuel), and in Argentina in 2007 (Celia Lury and Ana Gross), on the mobilisations of experts to consolidate a link between working conditions and health issues (Marion Gilles), on the production of activity data for disability policy in France (Pierre-Yves Baudot), and on the use of statistics in social mobilizations for gender equality (Eugenia De Rosa). Alain Desrosières wrote the last paper, coping with mobilizations proposing innovations in the way of measuring inflation, unemployment, poverty, GDP, and climate change. This special issue is dedicated to him, in order to honor his everlasting intellectual legacy

DOI Code: 10.1285/i20356609v7i2p198

Keywords: Activism; Repertoire of action; Protest; Social movements; Statistics

References


Appadurai A. (2001), “Deep Democracy: Urban Governmentality and the Horizion of Politics”, Environment and Urbanization, 13 (2): 23-43, doi: 10.1177/095624780101300203

Appadurai A. (2004), “The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition”, in V. Rao, and M. Walton (eds), Culture and Public Action, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bakhtine M. (1982), L’œuvre de François Rabelais et la culture populaire au Moyen Âge et sous la Renaissance, Paris: Gallimard.

Barone C. (2006), “Cultural capital, ambition and the explanation of inequalities in learning out-comes: a comparative analysis”, Sociology, 40 (6): 1039-1058, doi: 10.1177/0038038506069843

Barone C. and van de Werfhorst H. (2011), “Education, cognitive skills and earnings in compara-tive perspective”, International Sociology, 26 (4): 483-502, doi: 10.1177/0268580910393045.

Becker H. and Haacke H. (2014), “Profil de visiteurs et Comment j’ai rencontré Hans”, in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 67-72.

Boltanski L. (1987), The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boltanski L. (2009), On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation, Paris: Gallimard.

Boltanski L. (2014), “Quelle statistique pour quelle critique?” , in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 33-50.

Boltanski L. and Thévenot L. (2005), On Justification. The Economies of Worth, Princeton: Prince-ton University Press.

Borghi V. (2014), “Oltre il Castello dell’informazione: la valenza politica della conoscenza”, Lo straniero, 18 (166): 44-49.

Bourdieu P. and Haacke H. (1994), Libre Échange, Paris: Le Seuil/Les Presses du réel.

Bourdieu P. and Passeron J.-C. (1979), The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relations to Cul-ture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bourdieu P. (2012), Sur l'Etat. Cours au Collège de France (1989-1992), Paris: Seuil.

Bruno I. (2009), “The ‘Indefinite Discipline’ of Competitiveness. Benchmarking as a Neoliberal Technology of Government”,
Minerva, 47 (3): 261-280, doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9128-0

Bruno I. and Didier E. (2013), Benchmarking. L’État sous pression statistique, Paris: La Décou-verte.

Bruno I., Didier E. and Prévieux J. (2014), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte.

Castel R. (2003), From manual workers to wage laborers: transformation of the social question, New Brunswick: Transaction publishers.

Caillé A. (2012), De l'idée même de richesse, Paris: La Découverte.

Champy F. (2009), La Sociologie des professions, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Concialdi P. (2014), “Le BIP 40: Alerte sur la pauvreté!”, in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 199-211.

Cousin B. (2006), “Les violences policières de Gênes 2001 entre mise à l’épreuve du récit et mise en forme publique”, Déviance et Société, 30 (1): 67-89, doi: 10.3917/ds.301.0067.

Darr A. (2011), “Sales Work and the Situated Constitution of Legitimate Economic Exchange”, Work, Employment and Society, 25 (3): 506-521, doi: 10.1177/0950017011407961.

De Blic D. (2014), "Quantifier contre les chiffres ? Une estimation du coût des expulsions de sans-papiers", in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 183-195.

Desrosières A. (2002), The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning, Cam-bridge: Harvard University Press.

Desrosières A. (2008), Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification, Paris: Presses de l'É-cole des Mines.

Desrosières A. (2014), Prouver et Gouverner, Une analyse politique des statistiques publiques, Paris: la Découverte.

Desrosières A. (2014), “Statistics and social critique”, Partecipazione e conflitto. The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 7 (2): 330-341, doi: 10.1285/i20356609v7i2p330

Desrosières A. and Thévenot L. (2002), Les catégories socio-professionnelles, Paris: La Décou-verte.

Didier E. (2011a), “ ‘Compstat’ à Paris : initiative et mise en responsabilité policière”, Champ pé-nal/Penal field, doi: 10.4000/champpenal.79718

Didier E. (2011b), “L’Etat néolibéral ment-il? ‘Chanstique’ et statistiques de police”, Terrain, 57: 66–81, doi: 10.4000/terrain.14338.

Didier E. and Tasset C. (2013), “Pour un statactivisme. La quantification comme instrument d'ouverture du possible”, Tracés, 24(1): 123-140, doi: 10.4000/traces.5660.

Du Roy I. (2009), Orange stressé. Le management par le stress à France Télécom, Paris: La Dé-couverte.

Du Roy I. (2014), “Peut-on quantifier la souffrance au travail?”, in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Pré-vieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 169-182.

Ecole de la Cause Freudienne (2008), Quelle liberté pour le sujet à l’époque de la folie quantita-tive, Paris: Pleins Feux.

Eterno J. E. and Silverman E. B. (2012), The Crime Numbers Game: Management by Manipula-tion, New York: CRC Press.

Faucher F. and Le Galès P. (2011), The New Labour Experiment. Change and Reform Under Blair and Brown, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Florida R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class and How It's Transforming Work, Leisure and Everyday Life, New York: Basic Books.

Genel K. (2013), “L’autorité des faits: Horkheimer face à la fermeture des possibles”, Tracés, revue de sciences humaines, 24 (1): 107-119, doi: 10.4000/traces.5658

Gori R., Cassin B. and Laval C. (eds) (2009), L’Appel des appels pour une insurrection des con-sciences, Paris: Mille et une nuits.

Jacquot S. and Vitale T. (2014), “Law as Weapon of the Weak? A Comparative Analysis of Legal Mobilization by Roma and Women’s Groups at the European Level”, Journal of European Public Policy, 21 (4): 587-604, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.887138

Jany-Catrice F. (2014), “FAIR, le Forum pour d’autres indicateurs de richesse”, in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Dé-couverte, pp. 233-245.

Le Chevallier M. (2014), “Réussir en art grâce aux méthodes du consulting”, in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 133-153.

Le Galès P. and Scott A. (2010), “A British Bureaucratic Revolution? Autonomy Without Control, or "Freer Markets, More Rules" ”, Revue Française de Sociologie, 51 (1): 117-143, doi: 10.2307/40731130

Löwy M. and Sayre R. (2010), Esprits de feu. Figures du romantisme anti-capitaliste, Paris: édi-tions du Sandre.

Matelly J.-H. and Mouhanna C. (2007), Police: des chiffres et des doutes, Paris: Michalon.

Milner J.-C. (2011), La Politique des choses. Court traité politique I., Paris: Verdier.

Pénombre (2014), “Du nombre en public”, in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J.

Prévieux (eds), Statactiv-isme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 101-113.

Piketty T. (2014), Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Boston: Harvard University Press.

Piriou, J.P. (1992), L’indice des prix, Paris: La Découverte.

Porter T. (2012), “Funny numbers”, Culture Unbound, 4: 585-598,

doi: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.124.

Prévieux J. (2014), “Esthétique des statistiques. À propos de quelques ateliers artistiques statac-tivistes”, in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 89-99.

Rambach A. and Rambach M. (2001), Les intellos précaires, Paris: Fayard.

Silverman E. B. (1999), NYPD Battles Crime: Innovative Strategies in Policing, Boston: North-western University Press.

Sujobert B. (2014), “Comment intervenir sur le programme de la statistique publique? L’exemple des inégalités sociales”, in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 213-231.

Superflex (2014), “Nombre de visiteurs”, in I. Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La

Découverte, pp. 196-198.

Tasset C. (2014), “Les ‘intellos précaires’ et la classe créative: le recours à la quantification dans deux projets concurrents de regroupement social”, in I.

Bruno, E. Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 117-132.

Thévenot L. (1983), “L’économie du codage social”, Critiques de L’économie Politique, 23–24: 188–222.

Thévenot L. (2011), “Conventions for measuring and questioning policies. The case of 50 years of policies evaluations through a statistical survey”, Historical Social Research, 36(4): 192-217, doi: 10.2307/23032291.

Tin L.-G. (2014), “Qui a peur des statistiques ethniques?”, in I. Bruno, E.

Didier and J. Prévieux (eds), Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 155-166.

Topalov C. (1994), Naissance du chômeur: 1880-1910, Paris. Albin Michel.

Tosi S. and Vitale T. (2009), “Explaining How Political Culture Changes: Catholic activism and the secular left in Italian peace movements”, Social Movements Studies, 8 (2): 131-47, doi: 10.1080/14742830902770282.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.