Email this article A comparative analysis of environmental discursive strategies: Joe Biden and Donald Trump
Abstract
This article presents a comparative discourse analysis of environmental rhetoric in the speeches of Donald J. Trump and Joseph R. Biden Jr., focusing on their contrasting approaches to climate change. Drawing on a small, focused corpus of eleven texts—including presidential speeches and electoral debates delivered between 2017 and 2022 – the study combines tools from discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to investigate how language constructs political stances, social identities, and ideological positions. Particular attention is paid to vocabulary (including “hooray” and “boo” words), grammatical structures (such as nominalizations and ergative constructions), and rhetorical strategies (metaphors, euphemisms, dysphemisms, and logical fallacies). Trump’s emphasis focuses on nationalistic, adversarial, and economically framed discourse, in which climate regulations are depicted as threats to prosperity and freedom, while environmental issues are minimized or reframed through euphemism. By contrast, Biden seems to employ a cooperative and institutional rhetoric, aligning environmental action with justice, responsibility, and global leadership, often invoking collective pronouns and legal-rational authority. The analysis demonstrates how similar keywords (e.g., “clean,” “jobs,” “freedom”) are strategically deployed to produce divergent ideological narratives. Ultimately, this study illustrates how environmental discourse functions as a site of political struggle in U.S. presidential rhetoric, where language not only reflects but actively shapes competing visions of economic development, environmental responsibility, and global governance.
References
Alexander R.J. 2013, Shaping and misrepresenting public perceptions of ecological catastrophes: The BP Gulf oil spill, in "Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines" 7 [1], p. 5.
Biber D., Conrad S. and Reppen R. 1998, Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cialdini R. 1984, Influence: The psychology of persuasion, William Morrow and Company, New York.
Childress S. 2012, Timeline: The politics of climate change, in "Frontline: PBS". https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/fr ontline/article/timeline-the-politics-of-climate-change/.
Conserva H. 2003, Propaganda Techniques, 1st Books Library, Bloomington, Illinois.
Fairclough N. 2013, Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language, 2nd ed., Routledge, London and New York.
Gee J.P. 2014, An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method, 4th ed., Routledge, London and New York.
Gupta J. 2010, A history of international climate change policy, in "WIREs Climate Change" 1, p. 637.
Jackson P. 2007, From Stockholm to Kyoto: A brief history of climate change, in "Green Our World" XLIV [2].
Kestin O., Lock H. and Gralki P. 2020, 12 important moments in the history of climate action: In photos, Global Citizen.
Luntz F. 2002, Straight Talk: Memorandum to Bush White House by GOP Consultant Frank Luntz, SourceWatch. https://www.sourcewatch.org/images/4/45/LuntzResearch.Memo.pdf.
McAdams D.P. 2020, The strange case of Donald J. Trump: A psychological reckoning, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
McEnery T. and Hardie A. 2012, Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice, Sage Publications, London.
Moser S.C. 2010, A history of international climate change policy, in "WIREs Climate Change" 1, p. 32.
Napolitano A. and Aiezza M.C. 2019, Trump is erasing climate change language: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of the US online environmental communications under Obama and Trump, in "Lingue e Linguaggi" 29, p. 147.
Partington A. and Taylor C. 2017, The language of persuasion in politics: An introduction, Routledge, London and New York.
Schleppegrell M.J. 1997, Agency in environmental education, in "Linguistics and Education" 9 [1], pp. 49-67.
Stubbs M. 2001, Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Wagner-Pacifici R. 2023, Anticharismatic authority: Joe Biden’s approximation of the ideal type, in "Politics and Society" 0 [0].
Wallis H. and Loy L.S. 2021, What drives pro-environmental activism of young people? A survey study on the Fridays for Future movement, in "Journal of Environmental Psychology".
Zillman J.W. 2009, A history of climate activities, in "WMO Bulletin" 58 [3].
Full Text: PDF
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
