Email this article “Like a Pupa starting to hatch”. The aesthetics of war and ethics of peace in Pat Barker’s Double Vision
Abstract
Abstract - Pat Barker's novel Double Vision (2003) addresses the ethics and aesthetics of witnessing and representing suffering in the context of recent hyper-mediated 'postmodern' wars (Bosnia, Afghanistan) and a global audience anaesthetized by spectacular excess. Her compelling exploration of the aesthetics of violence against issues of value, morality, shared humanity and truth, and the way she responds to them by weighing the potential of different art forms, provide a forceful poetic statement of the ethical possibilities of peace. As the protagonists confront the moral choices underlying the narrative, visual and ideological challenges of rendering the 'unsayable' and the 'unwatchable', relationality, partnership, emotional commitment, poetic affect and truth emerge as key steps towards viable responses to the experience of evil informing human life and art alike.
References
Banita G. 2010, ‘The Internationalization of Conscience’: Representing Ethics in Pat Barker’s Double Vision, in “Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik” 58 [1], pp. 55-70.
Banita G. 2012, The Internationalization of Conscience. Hemon, Barker, Balkanism, in Banita G. (ed.), Plotting Justice: Narrative Ethics and Literary Culture After 9/11, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London, pp. 205-250.
Barker P. 2004, Double Vision, Penguin, London and New York.
Brannigan J. 2005, Pat Barker, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Brannigan J. 2011, “To See and to Know”: Ethics and Aesthetics in Double Vision and Life Class, in Wheeler P. (ed.), Re-Reading Pat Barker, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 13-24.
Cavarero A. 2008, Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence, Columbia University Press, New York.
Dancev A. 2009, The Face, or, Senseless Kindness: War Photography and the Ethics of Responsibility, in Dancev A. (ed.), On Art, War and Terror, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 33-57.
Edemariam A. 2005, The Human Factor. Interview with Don McCullin, in “The Guardian”, 06.08.2005. http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2005/aug/06/photography.art (09.02.2016).
Gildersleeve J. 2009, Regarding Violence in Pat Barker’s Double Vision, in “Peer English” 4, pp. 32-46.
Jaggi M. 2003, Dispatches from the Front, in “The Guardian”, 16.08.2003. http://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/aug/16/fiction.featuresreviews (06.02.2016).
Jenkins F. 2013, A Sensate Critique: Vulnerability and the Image in Judith Butler’s Frames of War, in “SubStance” 42 [3], pp. 105-126.
Kauffmann K. 2012, ‘One Cannot Look at This’/‘I saw it’: Pat Barker’s Double Vision and the Ethics of Visuality, in “Studies in the Novel” 44 [1], pp. 80-99.
Levinas E. 1996, Peace and Proximity, in Peperzak A., Critchley S. and Bernasconi R. (eds.), Emmanuel Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 161-170.
McEwan I. 2005, Saturday, Random House, London and New York.
McCullin D. 2010, Unreasonable Behaviour: An Autobiography, Random House, London and New York.
Monteith S. and Yousaf, N. 2005, Double Vision: Regenerative or Traumatized Pastoral?, in Monteith S., Jolly M., Yousaf N. and Paul R. (eds.), Critical Perspectives on Pat Barker, The University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC, pp. 282-299.
Rawlinson M. 2009, Pat Barker, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Showalter E. 2003, Inner Visions, in “The Guardian”, 23.08.2003. http://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/aug/23/featuresreviews.guardianreview4 (19.02.2016).
Sontag S. 2003, Regarding the Pain of Others, St Martin’s Press, London.
Tate A. 2008, Contemporary Fiction and Christianity, Continuum, London.
Trabucco M. 2011, Between the Painting and the Novel. Ekphrasis and Witnessing in Pat Barker’s Double Vision, in Stadler G., Mitchell P. and Atkinson A. (eds.), Pockets of Change: Adaptations and Cultural Transitions, Lexington, Lanham, pp. 145-159.
Trabucco M. 2012, Pat Barker’s Double Vision: Vulnerability and trauma in the pastoral mode, in “Colloquy, Text Theory Critique” 23, pp. 98-117.
Full Text: pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
