Judical Re-Use: "Codification" or Return of Hegelism? The Comparative Arguments in the "South" of the World


The so called “Meta”- “Trans”- and “Cross”-constitutionalism do not pro-duce any definitive “codification”/constitutionalization in all social contexts where they are practiced, especially when those contexts have problems of economic and social un-derdevelopment, together with problems of a democracy that is “delegated”, rather than “deliberative”: practically, when the mentioned contexts coincide with the «South of the World»

DOI Code: 10.1285/i22808949a2n2p7

Keywords: “Judicial dialogue”; Trans-constitutionalism; Codification and Constitutionalization; South of the World; Judicial Re-Use

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia License.